dChan
Anonymous ID: 8ca65f April 17, 2021, 2:53 p.m. No.13449300   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13449246

>>13449247

I think there's got to be some truth to the tablets, the oldest unaltered history books we know of, if we can trust the translations, but also I think "The Gods" are deceivers and made the native Earth humans stupider to be their slaves, they didn't create us, humans are all basically the same anywhere in the unicos but the Annunaki are partly amphibian and/or reptilian so they don't give any fucks.

Anonymous ID: 8ca65f April 17, 2021, 3:02 p.m. No.13449361   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9389

>>13449260

The Behistun Inscription, the "Rosetta Stone" of Cuneiform Script

 

https://historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=2811

 

"The inscription includes three versions of the same text, written in three different cuneiform script languages: Old Persian, Elamite, and Babylonian. Babylonian was a later form of Akkadian: unlike Old Persian, they are Semitic languages. In effect, then, the inscription is to cuneiform what the Rosetta Stone is to Egyptian hieroglyphs: the document most crucial in the decipherment of a previously lost script.

 

"Translation of the text was a multi-step and multi-national effort based on earlier work done on the decipherment of the Old Persian script by Georg Friedrich Grotefend in the late 1700's when Grotefend discovered that, unlike Elamite and Babylonian texts, Old Persian text is alphabetic. In the following years, the efforts of [Eugène] Burnouf, [Christian] Lassen, and [Henry] Rawlinson (who had the remainder of the inscription transcribed in two parts, in 1835 and 1843) contributed to translating the Old Persian cuneiform text using the Zoroastrian book Avesta as a key, in addition to cross referencing with modern Persian and Vedic languages. With the Old Persian text deciphered, Rawlinson and others were able to then translate the Elamite and Babylonian texts (both of which were ancient translations of the Old Persian text) after 1843.