>>1344668 (LB)

Are you people this stupid that you have nit figured this out?

You are in the middle of a clan of con-artists

People who LIVE for deception

Who try to deceive in everything that they do.

If I were a member of the clan, I would choose one of the vocal YouTube personalities

I would tell him about Q's drops as soon as they come out, and add bits of SAFE info that an autist could infer but not a normie. Then I would make a few safe predictions. I would hook that YouTube personality hook line and sinker, proving beyond a doubt that I am the real Q.

And later, when I need to use him to shift the narrative, he will refuse to believe anyone who tries to tell him that I am not an insider, part of the Q team.

Welcome

To the merry, merry month

Of May

Watch the water well

Because a RED WAVE IS RISING.

Across the land

>>1345475

Not an expert but that photo seems a touch out of focus. Maybe a telephoto lens that autofocused on the right nipple which happens to be in the center of the photo.

Also, this seems to be a rather pastel painting style of tattoo, not a sharply defined cartoon. It is an unusual type of tattoo that make me think of Alice in Wonderland. For most of her career she had NO TATTOOS. Sometime not long before she started to shoot films for Wicked Productions, she got the tattoo. If you watch Vendetta, there are several clear shots of that area of the tattoo and there is NO BRAND there. Vendetta was shot in 2017. So it she does indeed have an NXIVM brand then she got it very recently. Of course the other possibility is that someone who is very skilled at Photoshop placed the brand in the photo that was shown in earlier posts.

Even though the brand was made on all girls with the same branding iron, the way that the scars formed may be different enough to distinguish them,. If you can match up the brand from Stormy's photo to one of the existing brand photos on the net, then that would prove a forgery. There will be small differences in all the brand photos due to the scar healing and to the different positions in 3D space in relation to the camera.

This is the kind of thing we should be discussing on this board. What facts do we actually have? How have we verified the facts? What possibilities have we ruled out? Where are the limits to online investigations that we are butting our heads up against? For instance, if we could go to Stormy and ask her to show that part of the tattoo then we could clear up the question of a brand. It really is not out of the question for someone to do that, because it introduces to Stormy another income source, i.e. speaking out against branding and slavery. She seems to be in the business that she is by her choice and she seems to be enjoying the being infamous.