>>13453174 lb

I had to sleep.

>I'm personally not a fan of digital anything, because I know that everything is compromised and you will leave a data trail.

Everything isn't compromised. You clearly aren't aware of the gross incompetence that plagues federal agencies…

Besides, having a decentralized public ledger is what cripples [them]. Right now, they can hide anything and everything from us and keep "oops"ing away our tax dollars. See, with the introduction of a public and decentralized ledger, [they] can no longer keep hiding those tax dollars. We notice any and all large movements of cash and the time it would take to make thousands or more transactions to different shell addresses wouldn't be effective for [them], eventually bottlenecking their routing power; additionally, people would start to notice the series of movements from particular wallets and to particular wallets, especially when the patterns become egregious. We already have a leg up on them in this regard, hence the close monitoring of "whales" on most (probably all) chains.

Monero isn't the answer, nor is Zcash or other "privacy coins". They just reinvent the same problem with promise of helping morans hide their transactions.

>Right now I would even go so far and say fuck digital money transactions, because everything is comp'd.

<sophistry

This is just stupid.

>Do we need banks, I'm not sure.

See, now you're asking the right question.

>verification problems

Now you understand the utility of trustless and immutable financial devices, right?

>we need centralized banks to protect people from fraud

This is how I know you know next to nothing about unbanking and the utilities of Blockchain.

It's imperative that you do your own research.

Please start with reading the Cypherpunk Manifesto.

>>13455961

Finally…

I thought you guys got lost in the storm or something.

Are you going to tell them who radniP is?

>>13455981

I think it's more like realizing The 100 and Game of Thrones are documentaries and what's going on beneath the surface, at the behest of the "aliens".

>>13456036

Yeah, well, it didn't bode well for their ancestors.

>>13456039

Hotels

Concrete

Dead bodies

>What happens under airports?

>>13456051

meh

some of them deserve it

Plenty are pretty awesome though.

>>13456142

Maybe now is a good time you start to learn what story the Bible actually tells.

>>13456173

>You know they don't give a fuck about their FED notes, they got physical stuff, including drugs and chidlren.

They use digital movements to wash digital monies, which they use to purchase said drugs and children. It's currently not traceable due to our economy being based on a private and centralized ledger.

>What you are doing though is making everyone else visible and trackable.

A decentralized, public ledger having integrity and being audit-able is a bad thing for [them] alone. We merely blend in with the economy.

No one notices Joe from down the block buying a lawnmower, but if Bill Gates sends one of his lackeys $2mil, we all notice.

>Also wait, you want to even remove all physical paper money for this tracking to work?

I don't have a clue what you're talking about. Did someone else say this or something?

Anon, the only way our ancestors valued currency was with metals or other resources… I'm certainly not advocating no physical backing… I'm not sure where you got this.

>I don't give a shit, if you want everyone to use that, you are wrong.

What I want is irrelevant. It will happen whether you like it or not.

>It would allow full tracking every normal person and that's what they want.

You haven't done the research to confirm this. Of that, I'm 100% certain.

>The internet itself is UNSAFE. Understand that. It was DESIGNED to be that.

This is a terrible argument. You're scared of people sharing knowledge on the internet? None of us would be here without this "glaring fault".

>If you think it's safe, because muh blockchain, you have no idea about computers.

Who's telling you this shit?

Are you reading what you're typing?

>Blockchain is even a terrible tech. It gets slower and slower the bigger it gets. It's a terrible tech in search for something to solve, and to my knowledge it doesn't solve anything. Well, maybe you can use it for voting, idk.

Yes, voting and other governance, insurance, just about everything finance, healthcare, legal and probably just about anything you can think of.

The limited scaling potential is being addressed at the moment and is largely what's fueling altseason, as explained before.

You have not done your own research. You're listening too much to tradfi puppets and morans with too much invested in legacy economic models like Schiff.

It's vital you do your own research and stop being a poorfag.

We need you out of the wage cage, anon.

>>13456249

>Are they connected underground?

>>13456250

Maybe you should ask who "you fucks" are.

>>13456197

There's good reason "jews", Jesuits and Masons all seem so similar.

No, it's not "everyone is secretly 'jewish'".

>>13456332

>So it's not blockchain

?

>I don't want a monetary system that is fully traceable.

It's not. Do your own research.

>If that happens it wasn't part of the deal, and it's part of the cabal plan. I want freedom, not even more internet shit.

SN was/is /ourguys/…

>When it's on the internet, it's traceable. You are thinking you are more intelligent that the agencies.

You have no clue what you're saying. I assure you.

No, I don't think I'm better at anything than any particular person. I don't have a reason to hide anything I do with money and I don't try to hide.

>Never said that, stop putting words in my mouth.

Funny of you to say that considering the rest of this conversation.

But, no, I'm saying that everything wasn't secure from the beginning, but here we are, in full light of [them], plotting their destruction, but here we are, doing the same thing we were doing before this started. Whether everything can be seen or not isn't relevant at this point.

>I don't trust my computer, I don't trust the internet. I don't trust any service on it.

This undeserved paranoia will stifle you.

>I want non-FIAT cash.

Do you think I'm advocating for [their] version of a pegged digital dollar?… We already have those and they're heavily scrutinized by US agencies…

You don't know what you're talking about and it's clear to anyone that's familiar with the inner workings of the space, I can assure you.

>I want privacy, you fucking asshat.

Well, you're in luck.

>Shill.

Is that a +1 for me?

I'll take it.

Enjoy being poor.

>>13456349

"Satanic" isn't the right word.

Figure out what the right word is.

>>13456374

What was the Balfour Declaration about?

Why?

They don't give a fuck about "Jews". They're quite useful for [them] and you focusing on "Jews" too much just further obscures [them].