>>13459745

>New Warp Drive Research Dashes Faster-Than-Light Travel Dreams—but Reveals Stranger Possibilities

weapons-grade baloneyium. the word space-time is the giveaway. there is no such thing, and they know it.

relativity is bullsnot, based on maxwell's INCORRECT equations.

deriving a corrected version of "relativity" using hertz's corrections of maxwell's equations gives a radically different result.

space is space and time is time. time is invariant.

"accepted" physics and cosmology are a bullshit smokescreen to divert people from discovering the truth.

>>13459870

>Thomas Gold who proved that petroleum is abiogenic and can be found in very deep boreholes like the 6km+ ones he drilled in Sweden to test his theory.

horsepucky.

only one problem with your "theory." the deep holes drilled in sweden ALL came up dry. sweden produces NO oil, and spends a great deal to import all it uses.

on the other hand, ALL known fossil fuel deposits contain billions of fossils.

THAT'S WHERE THE NAME CAME FROM! DUH!

>>13459899

i never said that. there is no physical barrier to faster than light travel.

>>13459905

>Carbon 12 contains 6 protons, 6 electrons and 6 neutrons.

ffs, here we go. now we're gonna have a "carbon is the mark of the beast" slide.

>>13459919

>>13459919

>I'm a fan of wormholes/folding space theories

space is nothingness. how do you "fold" nothingness?

put the graphic novels down and step away from the keyboard.

>>13459923

>Why do they concentrate on the word Carbon instead of saying Carbon Dioxide?

IDK, why do they say bradgelina instead of brad pitt and angelina jolie.

why do they insist on calling arithmetic math?

maybe they're just retards?

>>13459951

NOWHERE in there did you mention CARBON. how do you propose to make hydroCARBONS with out carbon?

abiogenic petroleum is a JOKE. several attempts to prove it by drilling in unlikely spots were ALL ABJECT FAILURES.

at this point there is ZERO evidence to support that hypothesis. ZERO, with a capital ZERO!