>>1345824
>http://www.milffox.com/milf-photos/Busty-Blonde-Milf-Is-Getting-A-Cumshot/
I think this proves that she was not branded. There are some very faint lines there that are consistent with the pastel markings of the tattoo around it. That is NOT the scar from a burn mark. If that is a scar that is fading then it is a surgical scar that was carefully closed by a skilled surgeon. The whole point of branding is to damage the skin so that the body CANNOT heal the scar.
I'm afraid this evidence proves that Stormy is right, she had a surgical scar that faded.
But there is more. The faint lines are in the wrong shape for an NXIVM scar
__
/\
Is an NXIVM shape. But she has something more like
__
/|\
And there is a gap between the /\ and the __ that does not appear in the NXIVM scar. Again this is proof that Stormy does NOT have NXIVM branding.
I know that forensic analysis is difficult and when the data are limited, it is hard to get a clear and immediate answer. But if you work at it and test EVERY theory and never accept an answer until all the competing theories are disproven then forensic analysis is very powerful.
We need to do the same thing in our analyses of financial data and business connections between people. Always test, always double check, always assume both the true case and the false case and make them battle one another through the evidence.