>>13464298 (pb)

I thought I read that Frank was supposed to be non-hack-able/DDOS proof, andmore in the line of having a different delivery system than the standard Web Host/CDN combos that have been de-platforming conservative sites.

I was thinking more along the lines of the prototype/run out of a platform that used mesh wi-fi tech rather than the traditional wired backbone. Figured Mike had the bucks to get that done.

Hard to believe with the the bad experience sites like 8Kun have had that any programmer would think they could trust a web host/CDN model, and that they were smart enough to beat the hackers and DDOS attempts.

Doesn't make sense.

>>13464436

Gen Mike Flynn spoke there, correct?

Lin said in that speech that he was asked to wrap it up, and to make sure to bring the heat. IOW, he got a green light.

I don't believe Gen. Flynn has denounced Lin's speech, and, to boot, Gen. Flynn appears on the roll-out of Frank with Mike Lindell as a prominent host a few days later.

No Q follower would find anything Lin said a new revelation, either, although I don't believe Q ever said explicitly what Lin said, in the speech and Lin does admit he uses hyperbole. Little bit of the crowd I saw didn't seemed shocked either.

Might be why Jim A. felt it necessary to drag Q into the Frank roll-out. Q hasn't posted going on 5 months and he's still in their heads 24/7. Funny, too, how Jim A. tries to link Mike Lindell to Q, but not Lin. Wanted to avoid the Streisand effect on the Lin speech, maybe.

If someone told, me and I'm talking hypothetically, that they knew for sure that Q was either Mike or Lin, I would pick Lin. No hesitation, either. Strange, to me, that Jim A. wants to make ta Mike/Q link.

>>13464477

Kind of what I was thinking/hoping.

>>13464626

Good point.

Ties into my other post about Jim A. trying to link Mike up with Q when the most obvious Q link would be Lin's speech in Tulsa.

So, looking for Frank to be de-platformed for being conspiracy theory related.

Gen. Mike Flynn is involved in both events, too.. Not a coincidence, IMO. He may be the one spinning the dials and pulling the levers on this puppy.

>>13464725

>She is the niece of a Brainerd police officer.

When I was called for jury duty, having a relative who was law enforcement was one of the questions asked to the jurors as a group.

I do, and was sent home and told I didn't need to come back. Surprised the defense let #9 through. Not a good sign.

1st case on the docket the day I went in involved domestic abuse. The overview of the case presented included testimony from the responding police, 1st responders who treated the victim and the emergency room doctors who treated the victim. No way for me to be neutral going in. Others swore they could, and since them I never would trust any jury.

>>13464850

>how so

If the jury was in the courtroom when the judge said this, it is telling them their verdict don't mean shit, either way.

So, as a jury member, who is going to be sequestered until they reach a decision, would you want to draw it out or just deliver a meaningless verdict as soon as possible and go home?

My guess, since Waters is involved (can be passed off as crazy, and has a record of incitement, so same old, same old, never meant anything by it excuse holds), the word in the pipe is he walks and a mistrial motion causes a do-over.

NG is there to quell the riot, and arrests have already been made, so an acquittal won't bring the response that another drawn out trial would.

Waters didn't go there on her own. She doesn't do shit unless Pelosi gives the go ahead. Also don't think Walz called in the NG. Military took over and that's why Pelosi had to send Waters, because the rioters were staying away. Don't think Walz would buck Pelosi on the NG. Military fucked them up.

>>13464927

After curfew Saturday night. Could be 17 or 18, not sure of the exact time comments were made.

>>13464960

>Asked to leave the city by devil dogs plausible…

Or, military doesn't want pictures of their defenses out there.