19-8709 GREER V. UNITED STATES

DECISION BELOW: 798 F.Appx 483

CERT. GRANTED 1/8/2021

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Last year, this Court held in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), that,

in a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(2), the government must prove

not only that the defendant knew he possessed a firearm, but also that he knew he

belonged to the relevant category of persons barred from possessing a firearm.

Since then the circuit courts of appeals have attempted to define the scope of

review when applying the holding of Rehaif to cases remanded by this Court.

The question presented is:

Whether when applying plain-error review based upon an intervening United

States Supreme Court decision, a circuit court of appeals may review matters outside

the trial record to determine whether the error affected a defendant’s substantial rights

or impacted the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the trial?

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 18-12963

https://www.c-span.org/video/?510027-1/greer-v-united-states-oral-argument

>>13471501

20-444 UNITED STATES V. GARY

DECISION BELOW: 954 F.3d 194

ORDER OF FEBRUARY 22, 2021:

JEFFREY L. FISHER, ESQ., OF STANFORD, CALIFORNIA, IS APPOINTED TO

SERVE AS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT.

CERT. GRANTED 1/8/2021

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether a defendant who pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as a felon, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) and 924(a), is automatically entitled to plain-error relief if

the district court did not advise him that one element of that offense is knowledge of his

status as a felon, regardless of whether he can show that the district court’s error

affected the outcome of the proceedings.

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 18-4578

https://www.c-span.org/video/?510028-1/united-states-v-gary-oral-argument

Question: On the Motion to Proceed (Motion to Proceed to Executive Session to Consider Vanita Gupta to be Associate Attorney General )

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=117&session=1&vote=00155

TIM SCOTT-SC didn't vote, Mr. Faster didn't want Kamala casting her vote

>>13471527

mask.avi

https://twitter.com/SenatorTimScott/status/1384575147420659713

he can tweet but not vote on subcabinet positions, gr8

04.20.2021

Grassley Calls On Schumer To Extend Restrictions On Deadly Fentanyl Analogues Fueling Opioid Overdose Deaths

Extension must allow time for Congress to develop more permanent solution

WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is calling on Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to extend temporary restrictions on fentanyl analogues that are driving overdose deaths during the opioid epidemic. In a letter this week, Grassley pressed Schumer to advance an extension that provides necessary time for Congress and the administration to work toward a more permanent solution to address rapidly evolving opioid analogues.

“A sufficiently lengthy extension is necessary for the Administration interagency and Congressional partners to come together on how to schedule fentanyl-related substances in balance with criminal justice and research equities. Additionally, we must ensure ample time for the new Administration to build its staff, develop internal goals and strategies, and report to Congress – either through hearings or briefings – on its progress,” Grassley said.

On Monday, Grassley introduced bipartisan legislation to extend the temporary authority to add substances substantially similar to fentanyl to Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. In 2020, Congress extended this authority through May 6, 2021, with unanimous support in the Senate. https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-calls-on-schumer-to-extend-restrictions-on-deadly-fentanyl-analogues-fueling-opioid-overdose-deaths

>>13471706

04.20.2021

Grassley, Spartz Urge President Biden To Prohibit ‘Sue-And-Settle’ Practice

WASHINGTON – Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) joined Representative Victoria Spartz (IN-05) and 16 colleagues to send a letter to President Biden urging him to prohibit a practice known as ‘sue-and-settle.’

Sue-and-settle tactics place special interest priorities above the public interest by allowing activist agencies to circumvent the public rulemaking process through “friendly lawsuits” and settlements, undermining the Administrative Procedure Act and costing taxpayers billions of dollars.

"For years prior to the Trump administration, pro-regulation activists have colluded with complicit federal agencies to short circuit our transparent rule making process and force new policy without any public input. The Biden administration should build upon the work of the Trump administration to once and for all put a stop to this abusive practice," Sen. Grassley said.

“Congress must provide proper legislative oversight of the executive branch to ensure transparency and accountability,” said Rep. Spartz. “Congress is the only branch which should be producing laws. All rulemaking processes must be conducted under the Administrative Procedures Act and have proper regulatory oversight.”

According to the American Action Forum, from 2005 to 2016, twenty-three sue and settle regulations resulted in a cost burden of $67.9 billion, with $26 billion in annual costs. Sixteen of the rules impose paperwork burdens on American jobs creators of more than eight million hours.

In addition to the letter issued to President Biden, Rep. Spartz and Sen. Grassley are also working to address this issue legislatively.

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-spartz-urge-president-biden-to-prohibit-sue-and-settle-practice

Patriots Day really aggro’d the fuck out of haters and leftists

Stay mad 😂

The qhorde approved aggregator qanon.pub ever get attacked? They were foaming at the mouth over qmap and ain’t saying shit about qagg