Anonymous ID: 44deac April 20, 2021, 7:21 p.m. No.13475686   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5692 >>5699 >>5716 >>5738 >>5766 >>5778 >>5801 >>5871 >>5888 >>5897 >>5931 >>5955 >>5961 >>6013 >>6037 >>6101 >>6152 >>6198 >>6233 >>6280 >>6314

Black Lives Matter Militants Tell White Diners to ‘Get the F-ck Out of New York,’ Declare White Owned Taquerias ‘Not Welcome’

 

Black Lives Matter militants in New York are currently yelling at white outdoor diners to “get the f-ck out of New York” and declaring that white-owned taquerias are “not welcome.”

 

The far-left extremists are protesting in multiple cities across the nation — despite getting the verdict that they wanted in the Derek Chauvin trial.

 

The crowd declared “we don’t want you here” while harassing the diners.

 

The Gateway Pundit will be providing updates on what is happening in the cities throughout the evening.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/black-lives-matter-militants-tell-white-diners-get-f-ck-new-york-declare-white-owned-taquerias-not-welcome/

Anonymous ID: 44deac April 20, 2021, 7:24 p.m. No.13475703   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5738 >>5801 >>5871 >>5888 >>5897 >>5931 >>6013 >>6037 >>6101 >>6152 >>6198 >>6233 >>6280 >>6314

Lendman: Fake News About Navalny’s ‘Politicized’ Imprisonment

 

CIA asset, Western media darling, political nobody Navalny is imprisoned for 2.8 years near Moscow – for multiple breaches of his suspended sentence.

 

Along with embezzling millions of dollars for self-enrichment, he’s guilty of sedition.

 

Serving as an unregistered US foreign agent, he operated as a fifth column threat against his homeland.

 

Incarcerated in Pokrov, Russia’s penal colony number 2, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the following about him in early April.

 

Russia has different information from Western propaganda “on whether this particular inmate has been placed in a medical treatment facility or not.”

 

“All the necessary steps are being taken. Naturally, no inmate can count on any special conditions.”

“There are certain rules, even in cases when inmates get sick.”

 

“So, if he is truly ill, he will receive whatever necessary treatment is required.”

Last week, Tass reported the following:

 

“Convict A. Navalny was placed in the medical unit of the Penal Colony Number 2 in the Vladimir Region under constant observation of medical workers between April 5 and 9.”

 

“On April 9, his was brought back to the prison cell as his health condition got better.”

Doctors called his health satisfactory.

 

On March 31, RT reported that Navalny said he’d begin hunger-striking “to protest his prison conditions.”

On April 6, he was transferred to the prison’s medical unit after showing respiratory infection symptoms — according to the Federal Penitentiary Service.

 

At the time, Izvestia said prison authorities placed him under medical staff supervision for assessment and treatment as necessary.

 

Reportedly he experienced “severe” coughing and had a temperature of 100.5 degrees.

Three inmates in his 15-man cell contracted tuberculosis.

 

Tests showed he was TB-free and had not contracted seasonal flu-renamed covid.

Since his health improved, he’s now back in his cell.

Russophobic NYT propaganda claims otherwise, on Monday misreporting the following:

Navalny’s “personal doctors” — who hadn’t examined him — claimed his health weakened because of hunger-striking and “lingering effects” from military grade nerve agent poisoning — that never occurred.

One of his personal doctors hyperbolically claimed that he could die “at any moment.”

 

Despite not having examined him in prison, his doctors claimed 44-year-old Navalny could die from kidney and/or heart disease.

 

These illnesses seldom affect individuals his age, Navalny’s imprisonment began about seven weeks ago.

Reportedly he began hunger-striking on March 31.

 

https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/04/20/lendman-fake-news-about-navalnys-politicized-imprisonment/

Anonymous ID: 44deac April 20, 2021, 7:26 p.m. No.13475719   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5738 >>5801 >>5871 >>5888 >>5897 >>5931 >>6013 >>6037 >>6101 >>6152 >>6198 >>6233 >>6280 >>6314

Xi's Boao Forum Speech And The Messed Up Reporting Around It

 

A Reuters piece about a speech held by China's President Xi Jinping reveals how 'western' reporting skew the view of global issues:

 

China's Xi calls for fairer world order as rivalry with U.S. deepens

 

BOAO, China (Reuters) - Chinese President Xi Jinping on Tuesday called for a rejection of hegemonic power structures in global governance, amid growing tensions between Washington and Beijing over a widening range of issues including alleged human rights abuses.

 

Speaking at the annual Boao Forum for Asia, Xi criticised efforts by some countries to "build barriers" and "decouple", which he said would harm others and benefit no one.

 

China has long called for reforms of the global governance system to better reflect a more diverse range of perspectives and values from the international community, including its own, instead of those of a few major nations.

 

The bolted sentence is wrong. China has not called 'for reforms of the global governance system' but for a return to the existing global governance system that the 'west' over the last years tended to ignore.

 

Here is the relevant section of his speech (emphasis added):

 

- We need consultation on an equal footing to create a future of shared benefits. Global governance should reflect the evolving political and economic landscape in the world, conform to the historical trend of peace, development and win-win cooperation, and meet the practical needs in addressing global challenges. We need to follow the principles of extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits, uphold true multilateralism, and make the global governance system more fair and equitable. We need to safeguard the UN-centered international system, preserve the international order underpinned by international law, and uphold the multilateral trading system with the World Trade Organization at its core. World affairs should be handled through extensive consultation, and the future of the world should be decided by all countries working together.

 

To 'safeguard', 'preserve' and 'uphold' existing laws and organizations is not a 'call for reform' of the global governance system but a call for a return to its foundations which were set after the second world war. The Reuters writer pretends, like some 'western' politicians, that those foundations no longer exist.

 

The Reuters piece continues:

 

[China] has also repeatedly clashed with the biggest stakeholders in world governance, particularly the United States, over a range of issues from human rights to China's economic influence over other countries.

 

"The world wants justice, not hegemony," Xi said in remarks broadcast to the forum.

 

"A big country should look like a big country by showing that it is shouldering more responsibility," he said.

 

While Xi did not identify any country in his remarks, Chinese officials have in recent times referred to U.S. "hegemony" in public criticisms of Washington's global projection of power in trade and geopolitics.

 

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2021/04/xis-boao-forum-speech-and-the-messed-up-reporting-around-it-.html#more

Anonymous ID: 44deac April 20, 2021, 7:56 p.m. No.13475910   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5931 >>6013 >>6037 >>6101 >>6152 >>6198 >>6233 >>6280 >>6314

“We Must Assume the Jury Heard what Maxine Waters said – The Case May Very Well Be Reversed” – Alan Dershowitz Weighs in on Chauvin Verdict

 

Harvard law professor and author Alan Dershowitz went on with Rob Schmitt on Tuesday night following the guilty verdicts in the Derek Chauvin case.

 

Rob Schmitt: A lot of the rhetoric around this case, the media coverage on this case, and also the violence all last summer did that have an impact on this case?

 

Alan Dershowitz: We certainly can’t be confident that it didn’t. We have to assume that the jury heard what Maxine Waters said, what Sharpton said, what Crump said, what others said. I think jurors knew that if they came out with a verdict, other than murder, the top charge there would be violence on the streets. Every mayor was prepared for that. Every police chief was prepared for that. Why do we think the jury didn’t know that and didn’t allow it to enter its consideration? After all, the jurors were potential targets. Their names were released. If they had come to “the wrong verdict” they might be expected to be treated the way one of the witnesses was treated… painted in blood. I think the jurors learned that if they didn’t come up with the right verdict there businesses would suffer, their schools, their neighborhoods… That’s why I believe the case may very well be reversed.

 

Via Rob Schmitt Tonight:

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/must-assume-jury-heard-maxine-waters-said-case-may-reversed-alan-dershowitz-weighs-chauvin-verdict-video/