>>1347829 still pushing that awful backchanneled slide, i see?
>not religious, its biblical
<what a very humpty dumpty thing to say…
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'
'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.'
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master — that's all.'
i don't disagree, but just pointing out you're using a rather personal definition of "biblical", which many would see as being fundamentally religious (youknow, the texts chosen and established over centuries by… the established religion).
not the way to go at it, i'd say
>>1347887 wow much projection very mirror
>The one the shills went nuts over sliding?
so much so BO lost his temper over it, how much ye fucks were pushing this garbage down everyone's throat
>An image search shows it's true.
science at work, ladies & gents
>But keep at it.
i know you will, sad backchanneled fuck.
HAVE A WONDERFUL DAYe
and basically 98% of infowars content
>omg
1st strike
>lolz
2nd strike
>being so new you've just seen this pic for the first time
3rd strike, yer out
it also clearly exploded in the 2010s as a fresh coat of paint on the more general "conspiracy theorist" social engineering tactics.
that and the mandela effect idiocy
On that subject, I find these two lines from Q sum it up perfectly:
As a backup, they defined ‘conspiracy’ as crazy/mentally unstable and label anything ‘true’ as such.
This works given most of what they engage in is pure evil and simply unbelievable (hard to swallow).
It's crazy but it works: the more evil and psychopathic these evil monsters are, the more they are/feel protected… because normies can't help but project their own standards of good&evil and what is possible…
As for FE/Mandela, it's a logical continuation of the ongoing ConspiracyTheory prison management agenda: decades in, it's only natural they have to work a bit to keep it rolling.
Back during 9/11 truther movement, there were many, many obviously deliberately outrageous theories out there, getting all the exposure and Youtube suggestion links/algorithms, etc.
The way they played it with FE, so rushed, so sudden…
These people are stupid.
>instead of being as forceful as shills.
and that's where they show their hand.
they had a thread, they have had all the occasions in the world to do their thing with crying prosecution of their people…
they prefer screaming.
conclusion clear
>I think the Stormy shit is a waste.
of fkn course
>half /pol/ is already on it.
i guess they're not as trained in not being led astray by clowns as we've grown to be
except you're forgetting the MONTHS and MONTHS here during which this discussion has been slowly turned into powdered dead horse
>>1348304 there's this version
respectfully, the second you say
> blindly believe
you've just lost any credibility.
not saying it wasn't shills pounding on you, but using that to talk of Q and Q crumbs is dumber than dumb.
7 months and 1324+ posts in, the "blindly" just does not fly
> generally on this board, I mean. (…) What have you learned?
Right back at'cha, dear.
How long you been here? Not around enough to get tough, it seems.
You should know better than to judge anons based on what you can read here…
open board under constant shill attacks means any and all button to push will be pushed.
toughen up and get wiser.
but again, and i'm saying this as a friendly warning, for your own good, stop saying "BLINDLY".
You're allowed all the doubt you want, of course, but pretending blindness is a fallacy, and it destroys anything else you might have to say
also you FE fans would be way more believable if your attacks and surges didn't come in shifts.
your schedule is showing
never seen deleted posts before?