ok i have a graduate degree and read extensively - i enjoy history religion and politics - i read a lot - i am interested in everything. how can any rational anon compare a FE post to shill posts? If you would have asked me about FE a couple years ago i would have mocked and laughed just like many anons do now
but i was curious so i checked it out - does it all add up? are all questions ansered? No - not by a long shot - but there IS more than enough to cause any rational person to question what we have been taught - seriously quite a bit and more all the time.
When copernicus published his work it took 50 years to be generally accepted - then newton and galileo also offered math proofs and theories to cupport copernicus - NO ONE disputes math - but math is only as good as the assumptions it includes in the calculations. That is why the scientific method must validate with applied experiments and OBSERVATIONS.
So - like all science history, the best scientists of the day - very capable people went ot work to prove these theories with applied science experiments - guess what? they all failed. See eg Airy's failure and many related experiments from the 19th century. Failed. Its an eye opener
I cannot answer every question that established science has put out for 500 years - not at this time. But i can ask questions and if those questions are met with mockery - or with simple pointing to established dogma - then those questions will not have been answered.
Once again I will also remind anons that is was Q who caused this issue to appear on the board - 100% on Q and the cryptic posts have been set out over and over - no anon and certainly not Q have debunked this question - so why are anons so close minded? are they any better than the normies who laugh at Q? not to me.