Anonymous ID: 11ed7b April 21, 2021, 10:33 p.m. No.13484526   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4532

>>13484506

Yeah, that is why I post shit like that in every postโ€ฆ Oh, that's right I don't. Now fuck off with your attempt to normalize what is NEVER normal, and pretend it is everyone else who has the problem. Typical pedo tactics btw. They always think they are the normal ones and everyone else is sick for not understanding how beautiful it is, or not being brave enough to act on what they consider to be the natural impulse to be attracted to children.

Anonymous ID: 11ed7b April 21, 2021, 10:41 p.m. No.13484564   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4578 >>4610

>>13484551

Again, more pedo tactics. Trying to normalize what isn't normal, and act like it is the people that don't like it who have the problem. You are sick, and there is no cure for it but death. When you start thinking about acting on your impulse, do the honorable thing and kill yourself. Seriously.

Anonymous ID: 11ed7b April 21, 2021, 10:52 p.m. No.13484628   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4654

>>13484610

The pedos tactics are always so flimsy. "What we do and love is normal but people who notice what we are up to and have a problem with it are the sick ones, because it is normal to want to fetishize children."

And yes, pedos should kill themselves, including you.

I don't say that because I disagree with people on topics, only to people who it is almost certain that they will harm innocent children and ruin their lives. You are sick, whether you admit it or not, and when you get to the point where you want to act on that sickness, do the right thing and kill yourself.

Anonymous ID: 11ed7b April 21, 2021, 11:05 p.m. No.13484687   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4698 >>4710

>>13484670

The fact that you think only "shills" who would be disturbed with anime baker flooding board with that shit to try to normalize it, should scare you. Maybe take a hard look at yourself and what you and Q actually stands for before you throw shit like that out there.

 

Pro tip we are not on the side that thinks fetishizing children is cool or ok, and if you don't understand that and what is at stake, maybe you are in the wrong place?

Anonymous ID: 11ed7b April 21, 2021, 11:20 p.m. No.13484773   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13484751

"cartoons" with little girls with breasts, short tight dresses and skirts, 70's style high heel porno pumps, and thigh high stockings that just HAVE to be posted with every post he makes. 40 plus time per bread he bakes.

You are either as sick as he is, or just pathetically weak and morally bankrupt and worthless in this fight.

Anonymous ID: 11ed7b April 21, 2021, 11:24 p.m. No.13484799   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4805 >>4810 >>4849

>>13484786

Agreed. soem of it is his tactic being effective. Repetitive, consistent exposure to these image have made them seem normal to some.

Like it is normal for a little girl to be wearing tight dress or short skirt, and have on porno pumps and thigh his stocking etc.

"Oh it is just a cartoon".

Here of all places.

It isn't just Barr, we are truly doomed. WTF are we even fighting for if this pedo shit is normal and fine here in our own house?

Anonymous ID: 11ed7b April 21, 2021, 11:37 p.m. No.13484869   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4915

>>13484849

Interesting and hopeful. But I don't think this is their first rodeo doing this, and I don't think it is out of their character and just a tactic. They like this shit. They truly like it.

I really have to think about if I want to be here any longer, wit the majority just accepting it as either normal, or the price to pay for a baker, even a shitty one.

I mean if this is fine, what are we even standing for? Are we just against this shit when it is liberals doing it?

Anonymous ID: 11ed7b April 21, 2021, 11:45 p.m. No.13484912   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4942

>>13484881

I tired to lay this out on VOAT during her nomination process. She had written 2 completely contradictory position papers. #1 she said it was ok for judges to use their religious beliefs when considering the death penalty. i.e. It was ok to be against it as a Christian who values life.

 

#2 she wrote that it was not OK for judges to allow their religious beliefs to abortion cases. ie. it was not ok to be against abortion on Christian or Catholic principles, pro life.

WTF?

 

She was NEVER going to overturn Roe V Wade, it was all hopium.

You are right it was a dog and pony show, with the intent of keeping the status quo but playing to the conservative bases hopes.