Ben is a catastrophist who gets too easily caught up on CIA decals (limited hangouts). He doesn't understand magnetism on a fundamental level, let alone a planetary or cosmological level…
He makes good $$$ from gullible nubs though, eh? kek
**declas, fk…
Didn't say I dispute all he covers, but the CIA Earth catastrophe thing due to a magnetic shift demonstrates a lack of understanding on the fundamental nature of magnetism.
Half-right, doesn't make it a simple matter to overlook the half-wrongs…
Heat, accurately defined is simple vibration.
Revisit your assumptions, as to what you are observing.
Nope. I simply replied to the wrong post….
Let me ask you, if you follow his line of thinking;
Where does a magnetic pole actually exist?
Is it's locus (north or south) REALLY at an arbritrary location on the skin of a planetary body?
Does the meaurement of this location at a surface, actually mean anything?
It's like people who measure sea levels, with no constant datum (the earth's crust does not count, given what happens beneath this…).
He notices things. He describes their change. He explains it with pseudo science, because he cant quite give up his desire to connect with confirmists who believe in a particle based universe…
How in the hell did you get that from my post?
Exact opposite. Cone is Russell's analogy.
Wheeler's conjugate geometry of the toroid and hyperboloid is more accurate.
I'd love to answer your question, but I don't get drawn into discussions of belief - simply what is.
And besides, I don't want to keep you.
You'd lose your place in the cue for 'Ben's Big Dick-Kissing Day', and that would be tragic….
The dielectric and magnetic are conjugates.
Are you suggesting this is not the case, to divert?