Anonymous ID: 6ab9d6 April 22, 2021, 3:52 p.m. No.13489677   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9769

>>13489641

Yeah but that is kinda bullshit. If that were the case your WAFs sec provider would have already have policies and controls that would mitigate the issue.

Any shills that know what they are doing are always going to be jumping networks.

You would be dynamiclly blocking subnets or ips all day. Kinda like fighting beach erosion with a tennis racket.

Anonymous ID: 6ab9d6 April 22, 2021, 4:07 p.m. No.13489780   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9797

>>13489608

Hole lotta triggered ones today. I wonder if we can meter this activity to predict the point of precipice.

Here is a fun one to vibe on…we are all corks floating on the water as the wave flows through.

When will everyone realize we are all one? What you do to others you do to yourself.

Seems so simple yet most people will never understand that it is all one.

Anonymous ID: 6ab9d6 April 22, 2021, 4:16 p.m. No.13489864   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9882

>>13489769

>I have proven otherwise~

Have you?

Most security peeps know are ghost and don't telegraph their moves.

So they let a BO access the WAF infrastructure and set policy.

It violates separation of duties to ensure continuity in security.

Whatever you say bro…

I'm just here watching your show….

continue with your assumptions regarding assumptions….that is really sum tin

Anonymous ID: 6ab9d6 April 22, 2021, 4:29 p.m. No.13489980   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9995 >>9996

>>13489797

Very nice of you to say … thank you. I don't care either. Habbenings are going to habben regardless.

I really value the time here with everyone watching the show.

Its the only genuine conversation going on right now. Unfortunately many are afraid of their own shadows these days and are constantly popping off bullshit that they created in their own ego.

You got some thick skin anon.

Even if you explained why doing you is so important… they still would not get it…it is what it is.

Anonymous ID: 6ab9d6 April 22, 2021, 4:39 p.m. No.13490078   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>13489882

You did and thats great. I like where you going with this…

Now how are your regular expression skills?

Lets get your dataset dialed and review patterns in the snapshots of time.

Are all the said shills IPs consistent?

Do they correlate to their repetitive content?

You can do a lot with the basics especially if you can go back in time.

So if you add controls to black list IPs or subnets (if necessary) you may have a solution. But doesn't kun security provider handle this layer of the network? Manage the front door so to speak?