Anonymous ID: 7bf314 April 22, 2021, 9:25 p.m. No.13492188   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2205 >>2367

>>13492118

>baker

>Why did you notable this unsauced claim?

Because baker doesn't give a shit about the integrity of the board and piles any old crap into notables.

This baker compiles the worst notables of all bakers in the history of Q research.

This is one of the reasons this baker is universally despised.

Baker rejects any and all criticism and all those who do dare to criticise are nothing but nasty joos..

Anonymous ID: 7bf314 April 22, 2021, 9:37 p.m. No.13492274   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2309

>>13492183

>Didn't receive an Anon nomination either. Only Baker wants it in.

>TAKE IT OUT

Almost nothing baker adds to notables gets an anon nomination and good luck with getting baker to remove anything.

Baker wantonly adds clown sites such as Real Raw news and Sucha Faail and gives a mid digital salute to any anon who rejects sauceless and clown based disinfo.

Anonymous ID: 7bf314 April 22, 2021, 9:52 p.m. No.13492389   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2445

>>13492309

>t's irresponsible BAKER

>Look at the bullshit it sites- NYPost, Forbesโ€ฆ these are hit pieces

Your cries fall on deaf ears in the kitchen.

I'm not sure if baker is a shill or just retarded and incompetent or both, but it breaks my heart to see what this clown is doing to QResearch.

The four months it was out of the kitchen were glorious.