HOLY FUCK, BUUUUUUURNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEED
Biden Masks Up For A Video Call To Discuss Climate Change With World Leaders – He Appears To Be The Only One Wearing A Mask And Don’t Have His Country Flag
https://redstatenation.com/viral-photo-biden-masks-up-for-a-video-call-to-discuss-climate-change-with-world-leaders-he-appears-to-be-the-only-one-wearing-a-mask/
HISTORY OF FAUCI AND HIS RETARDED LIES
Perhaps old news here, but how is it that this guy had a job post 1983 after this epic failure? Fauci claimed that children living in close quarters could catch AIDS from family members.
"The mysterious and deadly AIDS disease may be transmitted by routine close contact in a family household"
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/05/05/Household-contact-may-transmit-AIDS/7738420955200/
See, we have seen this pattern before. Fauci speculates wildly on the transmittable and severity of a disease, gets a cult following who looks at him as savior, and when he walks it back and makes it sound less bad… he's a hero.
Sound familiar?
In May 1983, amid the rapidly escalating AIDS crisis, a doctor at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) promoted a stunning theory about the newly encountered disease in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Noting that the same issue of the journal contained an article documenting one of the first cases of the immunodeficiency disease’s appearance in an infant, the author sounded an alarm about “the possibility that routine close contact, as within a family household, can spread the disease.”
The article took an increasingly speculative turn in promoting this new theory. “If indeed the latter is true, then AIDS takes on an entirely new dimension,” it continued. “If we add to this possibility that nonsexual, non-blood-borne transmission is possible, the scope of the syndrome may be enormous.” Although the article reiterated the need to “be cautious” in accepting these findings as they awaited more evidence, the discovery “should at least alert us to the possibility that we are truly dealing with AIDS in children,” as transmitted through routine interaction.
The author of the article has since attained widespread familiarity. It was Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, a rising star within the NIH bureaucracy.
Press accounts, noticing Fauci’s article, immediately sounded the alarm. “Household contacts can transmit AIDS,” read one nationally syndicated report on the UPI wire dated May 5, 1983. The Associated Press queried the next day “Does AIDS spread by Routine Contact?” and quoted Fauci as their lead authority. The New York Times raised the specter of household transmission between family members, invoking Fauci’s commentary as its main authority.
https://www.targetliberty.com/2021/02/when-anthony-fauci-stoked-crazy-fear.html
Journal article here:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/386561
Chicken Little was at it again in 2010, except this time on the other end. No money to be made on Hatians, so let em die…
On February 1, 2010, less than a month after the devastating earthquake that destroyed much of Haiti, Anthony Fauci went on the National Institute of Health’s radio program to talk about health concerns in Haiti following the quake.
The audio of the interview sits unlisted on YouTube with only six views at the time of the writing of this article. In it, Fauci says “We often hear people say, mistakenly, but understandably, they’re concerned about an outbreak of cholera. There is no cholera in Haiti, so it would be extremely unlikely that there would be an outbreak of cholera in Haiti.”
RARE AUDIO: Dr. Fauci WRONGLY predicted "there is no cholera in Haiti so it would be extremely unlikely that there would be an outbreak." Then, as the UN was beginning to cover up its role as the source, Fauci claimed cholera was already "there somewhere"
https://realalexrubi.substack.com/p/saint-anthony-fauci-the-hidden-history
— Alex Rubinstein (@RealAlexRubi) January 13, 2021
Fauci was dead wrong. According to the United Nations, the cholera outbreak that followed in the next months eventually infected 800,000 Haitians, killing more than 9,000. But since the source of the outbreak was the United Nations itself, they tried to cover up its origins.
https://wearechange.org/saint-anthony-fauci-the-hidden-history/
Why am am struggling with waking others up?
This is a subject I've been pondering for a long time. I think I've identified 3 reasons why people are resistant to waking up:
1)Ignorance: General lack of information and not having the historical understanding of past events and how they are related to the present.
2)Naivety: "they would never do that". No! YOU would never do that. Stop projecting your morals onto other people.
3)Social identity/ social adherence: "I don't want to be seen as a conspiracy nut". Wanting to go along with the crowd. It's easier, and doesn't cause social friction if I just believe what others believe.
Now think about it. When we try to "wake someone up", we usually do it through #1, and give the people information. But #2 & #3 are still a glaring problem. Depending on whether the person is left or right brain dominant will determine what number is most difficult to tackle. A right brain dominant person (who thinks in more emotional terms) will not gain much from knowledge and facts alone.
Number 2 and 3 are much harder walls to penetrate. You can expose the person to uncomfortable truths and hope that helps them be less naive, but that's usually a long term process. Some people would rather be in the dark than admit things are as bad as they are. And number 3 has more to do with societal norms. Therefore 1 person cannot control that factor. This could also be the reason why they say that a person has to hear an idea like 9/11 was an inside job from an average of 7-12 different sources before they start to break down walls and begin to take it seriously or look for more information. This is why everyone planting seeds is important. Usually one person alone can't be the person to wake someone up.