>>13500624

>Is it too far of a reach to think that possibly Q intended for us to follow these crumbs/hints and connect with the pics? Were we meant to discover the changes in bollards so as to date the London pics? And to the charitable work for young people?

>

Perhaps, perhaps not.

There is this facebook page though:

https://sw-ke.facebook.com/HackneyQ/videos/john-paul-clarke-film/413777122602400/

I know HackneyQ is really just hackney quest but why not have the word Quest in full?

There was discussion on a previous UK board about the circumstances of John Paul's death, some as I remember suggested the "car attack" connection, so it is nice to see it being picked up again.

I forget which previous UK board it was discussed on.

There is also this from Hackney Quest's website:

http://www.hackneyquest.org.uk/index.php/jpc-fund/john-paul-clarke-fund-story

see screenshots

The video of what projects were run using the John Paul Clarke fund is no longer available on youtube.

I'm personally still of the view that something smells off about his death.

>>13500624

>and had starred in a short film Salome – which was taken to the Sundance and Cannes film festiv

>>13500624

>Had just started amature acting before 'starring' in a film that went to a major film festival?

>

I've been looking for the short film Salome taken to the film festival in cannes and found this link…there is no mention of JPC in the closing titles:

https://vimeo.com/94550681

It would be good if someone could find the correct film.

Salome.

2 women of the name Salome in the bible.

see screenshot taken from here:

http://www.kingjamesbibledictionary.com/Dictionary/Salome

and here:

https://www.womeninthebible.net/women-bible-old-new-testaments/salome/

The Bible text Mark 6:17-29

17 For Herod had sent and seized John, and bound him in prison for the sake of Hero’di-as, his brother Philip’s wife; because he had married her. 18 For John said to Herod, “It is not lawful for you to have your brother’s wife.”

19 And Hero’di-as had a grudge against him, and wanted to kill him. But she could not, 20 for Herod feared John, knowing that he was a righteous and holy man, and kept him safe. When he heard him, he was much perplexed; and yet he heard him gladly.

21 But an opportunity came when Herod on his birthday gave a banquet for his courtiers and officers and the leading men of Galilee. 22 For when Hero’di-as’ daughter came in and danced, she pleased Herod and his guests; and the king said to the girl, “Ask me for whatever you wish, and I will grant it.” 23 And he vowed to her, “Whatever you ask me, I will give you, even half of my kingdom.” 24 And she went out, and said to her mother, “What shall I ask?” And she said, “The head of John the baptizer.”

25 And she came in immediately with haste to the king, and asked, saying, “I want you to give me at once the head of John the Baptist on a platter.” 26 And the king was exceedingly sorry; but because of his oaths and his guests he did not want to break his word to her.

27 And immediately the king sent a soldier of the guard and gave orders to bring his head. He went and beheaded him in the prison, 28 and brought his head on a platter, and gave it to the girl; and the girl gave it to her mother.

29 When his disciples heard of it, they came and took his body, and laid it in a tomb.

Matthew 14:1-12

1 At that time Herod the tetrarch heard about the fame of Jesus; 2 and he said to his servants, “This is John the Baptist, he has been raised from the dead; that is why these powers are at work in him.”

3 For Herod had seized John and bound him and put him in prison, for the sake of Hero’di-as, his brother Philip’s wife; 4 because John said to him, “It is not lawful for you to have her.” 5 And though he wanted to put him to death, he feared the people, because they held him to be a prophet.

6 But when Herod’s birthday came, the daughter of Hero’di-as danced before the company, and pleased Herod, 7 so that he promised with an oath to give her whatever she might ask.

8 Prompted by her mother, she said, “Give me the head of John the Baptist here on a platter.”

9 And the king was sorry; but because of his oaths and his guests he commanded it to be given; 10 he sent and had John beheaded in the prison, 11 and his head was brought on a platter and given to the girl, and she brought it to her mother.

12 And his disciples came and took the body and buried it; and they went and told Jesus.

Salome, Jean Benner (last screenshot)

>>13518280

I'm having no luck finding the version of Salome with John Paul Clarke…

Here is a link to the coroner's report:

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Clarke-2015-0256.pdf

see screenshots.

"The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative, the cause of death being Multiple Trauma"

Q 2530

https://qanon.pub/index2.html#2530

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: dd90e3 No.4118750

Dec 2 2018 17:28:47 (EST)

What you are witnessing in France has nothing to do w/ gas [forced narrative].

Vive la France!

Q

See Q 2531

You are learning, Anon.

[J C] & Vive la France.

Riots in France today.

Comey testimony?

Do you believe in coincidences?

Q

>>13500689

>Through at least that connexion, look to FRANCE pic/s

Could someone direct me to the relevant FRANCE pics?

>>13500624

> 2ec6a54651b9f28⋯.png

I thought it was worth a look to see if anyone pictured in the Emma Bartholomew article was among the people in pics dropped by Q

>>13519378

> 75b58c49a73e028⋯.png

I can't, but some of the women visible in the Q pics have their faces at least partially obscured.

The France pics are long after the death of JPC. If there is a connection it seems the connection would have to be someone who knew him. Does anyone know the location of the original pics provided by Q? It might be useful to know the origin and see what else is there in the form of writing and further photographs.

I was looking again also at the Coroner's report. Does it not look kind of … well, sparse to other anons? There seems to be nothing about his death really other than, a narrative being settled on regarding the circumstance.

I'm just wondering here, is it worthwhile trying to dig on both Coroners? The one compiling the report and, the one it is being submitted to?

I guess I'm making the suggestion in the knowledge that there was some controversy around the Coroner in the JE death, and Sandy Hook and many others, so we know that in America there is collusion at the Coroner's office: Why not in the UK?

I've posted plenty about the Scottish Judiciary in the Scottish board…digz on Coroners might be warranted.

This Coroner's report is under regulation 28 and is a "REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS", is there a possibility there is a further (earier dated) report in to the death of JPC?

Who other than police at the scene would have written up reports about his actual death and not just focus on future prevention of deaths?

>>13519378

>the time frame of the London pics - 2014

5th march 2014 was the date of the accident and JPC was 35 when he died, the film then is likely to be seen no later than 2013 at Cannes or Sundance Festivals; it could easily be several years previous given his age at the date of his death.

>>13519002

paragraph 7, schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5

The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/regulation/29/made

I've previously pointed out on Scottish boards that the head of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) has the power to withold information from the PUBLIC during a PUBLIC INQUIRY at her own discretion. It appears that the daughter of Lord Cullen (he of dunblane whitewash fame) is the Secretariat of the SCAI

All public money spent and yet allows those granted the privilege to serve the public (whose funds are being used, or abused) are able to keep findings from the PUBLIC.

Remember Lord Cullen is the conniving fuck that put a 100 year secrecy ordor on his own findings! Illegally it would seem.

>>13526305

>Mark Malloch Brown ? Seems to be well connected with Soros and Dominion.

Another Lord.

Here is some info on his voting history

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/peer/13929/lord_malloch-brown/divisions?policy=1065

european voting history

Lord Malloch-Brown voted a mixture of for and against more EU integration

TheyWorkForYou has automatically calculated this MP’s stance based on all of their votes on the topic. You can browse the source data on PublicWhip.org.uk.

All votes about more EU integration:

On 13 Jul 2011: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on European Union Bill — Minister Empowered to Determine Referendum on Increased EU Powers and Competences Not Required

Show vote

On 13 Jul 2011: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on European Union Bill — Suspension of Requirement for Referendum on Certain EU Decisions

Show vote

On 15 Jun 2011: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on European Union Bill — Expiry of Provisions Requiring Referendum Before Tranfering UK Powers to the EU

Show vote

On 13 Jun 2011: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on European Union Bill — Report (2nd Day)

Show vote

On 13 Jun 2011: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on European Union Bill — Requirement of Referendum Prior to the UK Adopting the Euro

Show vote

On 8 Jun 2011: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on European Union Bill — Report (1st Day) — Clause 2 — Treaties amending or replacing TEU or TFEU

Show vote

On 18 Jun 2008: Lord Malloch-Brown voted no on Lisbon Treaty — Delay till 20 October 2008 — rejected

Show vote

On 18 Jun 2008: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on Lisbon Treaty — Ratification by all states before coming into force — rejected

Show vote

On 9 Jun 2008: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on Lisbon Treaty — Restrict the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union — rejected

Show vote

On 4 Jun 2008: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on Lisbon Treaty — Parliament to scrutinise the European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs — rejected

Show vote

On 4 Jun 2008: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on Lisbon Treaty — Parliament must approve the government's policy towards the Common Agricultural Policy — rejected

Show vote

On 4 Jun 2008: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on Lisbon Treaty — Act of parliament needed for the government to accept future changes to the Lisbon Treaty

Show vote

On 19 May 2008: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on Lisbon Treaty — Parliamentary approval required for any future changes made to the Treaty of Lisbon — rejected

Show vote

On 12 May 2008: Lord Malloch-Brown was absent for a vote on Lisbon Treaty — Government must report on the operation of European competition policy — rejected

Show vote

Vote information from PublicWhip. Last updated: 2020-07-15. Please share these votes responsibly.

Is it just me or do many of these "Lords" seem to be horrible sneaky, self-serving cunts?

I don't give any of these people authority over me. Who the very fuck are these people who decree authority over the rest of us?

I'm about fed up with this system of self interest that governs the world, no matter whether you call it right, left or centre.

Everyone seems to fear a new world order, but that is exactly what we need……A NEW WORLD ORDER, WHERE THE PEOPLE KEEP THE POWER. Where all (wo)men are equal. There will never be another opportunity like this one to change the world.

It can only happen peacefully. At no other time in history have all the world's separate racial and religious groups been treated with the same contempt. Right now we are all the same, we are all slaves to corrupt government.

Government is the real virus!