>>134955
Minor fact but somehow it seems important.
I bet Q "prey" was referring to the Pope.
That guy is definitely a shill who needs to be filtered.
On the other hand, even though I just made the same point as you, I took another look at the Pope photo and that is Benedict, not Frances, in the photo.
I am not certain Benedict is a bad guy. The red shoes in the Pope's case might be benign.
>Pope is a replaceable Rothschild lackey
Yes, I agree. Maybe 100 years ago the Pope seemed to have some frightening world-domination image but lately the Vatican seems like such a lame institution.
who know though, I think the same thing of the British royal family yet some people say the royals still have an important role in world affairs…. I have to plead ignorance on both of these.
I guess, I don't know. When he was just Cardinal Ratzinger he wrote some very intelligent stuff, really interesting. His "Ratzinger Report" was at the time (1980s?) enough to make you think some Catholics had their shit together.
But not being a Catholic or really caring much about them I will leave the final judgment to more knowledgable anons.
I think Q is being extremely generous with the information we've been graced with.
He has told us an awful lot.
My frustration, and I think yours, and I think Q's, is the slow pace of events unfolding in the real world. We want to see the guilty indicted and prosecuted. We want perp walks. When do we want them? Now.
Don't forget this is a big set of interconnected operations and it needs to overcome internal obstacles – and it is the f-cking federal government.
Q does not control all the pieces. He has a skill set that involves understanding public psychology and communication. Which crumbs are appropriate to drop, and when.
Any of us who claim we understand that part better than Q are just talking out of our asses.
Someone at FreeRepublic has been reporting on Q posts for the past couple weeks and it does not seem like a bad thing.
Nothing we can do about it either way, obviously.
Up till recently 20-30 replies was the norm but today's is in the 60s already.
It's another tangent for information to spread, and potentially put some fear into the bad guys, and I don't see the freeper community being people likely to wander over to the chans (I think boomers are actually the youthful ones at FreeRepublic). Anyway, an interesting development.
http:// freerepublic. com/focus/f-chat/3625104/posts
Living an alternative lifestyle does not disqualify you from the fullchan community. We are accepting of all kinds here.
For clarity, it might be helpful if you were to preface your remarks with something like:
"As an unironic faggot, I think ….."
This would allow better understanding for everyone.
Well spoken truth, desu.
>>135322
There was a mixup with payroll and some of the worker anons are awaiting their checks, so the job of reconciling the 2 boards is temporarily on hold.
No prob, it's good to have you here.
BTW Amazon is having a sale on mens' scarves and brown turtleneck shirts.