>>135064

The photo on the left looks badly shopped. Are there any other photos of this gathering?

>>135074

If it is shopped, you have no point. Probably!

>>135081

Probably, probably doesn't cut it. Don't ya think? If there's doubt about the authenticity of the image, it shouldn't be referred to in order to make the point that I'm not sure that you're trying to make.

>>135090

But, but, but, it's such an easy target.

>>135202

Yep, plenty of other, and clearer photos to reference. It's still circumstantial. So, he likes red shoes, and he had the artist of the revolting paintings, paint red shoes on the children, because he likes red shoes. He loves red shoes. See where I'm going with this?

I'm pretty well convinced that he's pond scum, but I advise against pushing something as evident, when its only circumstantial.

I like red shoes, I love red shoes. I have at least 4 pairs of red shoes. Are you going to plaster a happy snap of me on a meme with these guys?

>>135249

I don't answer personal questions on the boards. I made my point. Its all circumstantial and should not be presented as anything but.

>>135298

Yeah ah, I'm not biting. I don't answer personal questions, and I'm particular about personal information that I volunteer. I'll leave you to keep guessing, if you've got nothing better to do.

>>135339

^^^

This.

Someone had to say it.