>>13512904

Well, I have never been to space, so what initially hits my sensibilities as normal and abnormal is not necessarily going to lead me to correct conclusions.

For example, shadows here on the ground are much softer than what is supposed to occur in space because the atmosphere creates diffusion of the light.

This is the same with stars - on Earth, they look like glowing orbs, however, in space they appear like far sharper and smaller points of light. Which is also a potential explanation for why the cameras, designed for use in docking, do not pick up stars.

I am not going to tell you that you must believe those explanations - I am simply going to say that they do at least align with what I understand about physics and seem plausible. Since I have not been to space and have not attempted to record my own videos up there, I can't really say whether or not the videos look "fake." Just that they do not look like what would happen if I were to record an object outside.

On that note, stars and the like rarely appear in home videos taken at night. Taking pictures of the moon and such is often disappointing.

>>13513038

Why would you want to destroy the evidence of an 'elite' plan to take over the world and treat people as their cattle?

How many innovations and breakthroughs in understanding God's creation were destroyed by fools who appoint themselves to be god's own judgment?

If you're going to proclaim yourself to be God, you might want to do a bit of study into the wisdom behind God's creation and its mechanisms before charging off to club people and things upside the head. Show a little good faith dilligence toward the role.

>>13513207

Destruction is rather lizard brained, but as a dragon, I am rather good at leaving behind burning villages. So let's say it's time to scorch some earth in true lizard brained fashion.

Let's go destroy some rocks with words written on them to prevent our population from being abused.

This is why you are not given command of things.

>>13510696

>Easier to do reliable research before interwebz

I disagree with this. Between around 2000 and 2010 were some of the most glorious years of information access and productive discussion. Internet search engines were generally competing to provide relevant results to a search querry, most of internet socialization was occurring on forums and many driven to the internet were doing so as part of their jobs or hobbies.

Then two things happened… Twitter and internet 'smart phones.' The sudden prevalence of 'viral' disruptions converted many providers of internet accessibility into information control and suppression. This also enticed various actors to use viral disruption and disinformation campaigns - none of which our laws and social culture are fully prepared to deal with.

On one hand - it's a bad deal when the internet can be used to spread panic or fear inside of your nation, because it's obvious this could be done by various hostile entities with designs against your nation.

On the other hand… When you begin to gatekeep information and gain the power to unperson people and ban them from participating in the commons - you've created violations of constitutional rights as well as a tyrannical position capable of obscene capriciousness.