Tyb
Tyb
CodeMonkeyZ,
[25.04.21 10:42]
Called @BobbyPiton earlier and had a chat about the potential use of the UV light station.
Since UV is able to detect oil from finger prints, if there are no fingerprints on the ballot then the likelihood of the ballot being marked through a non-human process is high.
No finger prints? Scrutinize!
Give @BobbyPiton a follow while you’re at it, he is doing great work with building the phantom voter data sets and corresponding algorithms.
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/114
CodeMonkeyZ,
[25.04.21 11:01]
They are not lifting fingerprints, but a lack of fingerprints might be a sign of a ballot that was not marked by a human.
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/115
CodeMonkeyZ,
[25.04.21 18:12]
UV light is able to detect fingerprints. I talked with Bobby Piton and we discussed whether the audit team may be looking for fingerprints or not. It was our conclusion that a lack of fingerprints may mean the ballot might have been marked using non-human means.
In such situations, extra scrutiny of the ballot may be wise.
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/115
CodeMonkeyZ,
[25.04.21 18:24]
[Forwarded from JovanHuttonPulitzer (JovanHutton Pulitzer)]
TO ALL LOGICAL THINKERS there is no such thing as scan for fingerprints. Please be aware of all the foolish fake and deepstate attacks. That is all.
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/118
CodeMonkeyZ,
[25.04.21 18:26]
Jovan is involved in the audit and has confirmed that there is no fingerprints check.
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/119
notable