>>13517039
"Democracy" may be good or bad depending on the mental, spiritual, moral elevation of the population; Or not, as the case may be.
One must refrain from judging the concept at this time, since certainly the MAJORITY is for TRUMP, world-wide.
So Trump is the democratic choice.
Test of the alleged definition - in the Army Manual fails at this moment of history?
Dems are using the word to imply they have the Majority of the people on their side;
Which is a lie.
A real "Democracy" at this point would be DJTPOTUS, since he is a Populist, with the Majority support.
The Dems are using the negative connotation to the words "Democracy" to say or portray that "That is Us" - They are owning the negative image of it, though the adaptation of the term to themselves fails, since they are a tiny clique who lies to the public to get their vote" support, which isn't enough for the power they have assumed.
The Army definition fits them because they are out -of- control, vicious Lawless, etc.
but they are a minority; a dictatorship.
"Democracy" term is incorrect as applied to them; since they are a minority pretending to be a Majority.
The significant minority they actually have is only because of the Mass Broadcast Media control, culture engineering over decades, School failure, Censorship, Murder of real journalists. Campaign to call those who question them insane; , etc.,
It's astroturf rather than organic.
What would happen on an even playing field in the present context of instant communication?
That's an unknown.
What Dems are? and Communist Chinese are ?
An oligarchy not answerable to the people,
opposed by the majority of the people
Yet they take the title of "Democracy"
Is it a rumor that in a Democracy things inevitably go sour?
Such as, as many are taught. "It will always be this way. It has always been this way. Power corrupts Absolute Power corrupts absolutely and Human Nature is flawed?
In that case how does being undemocratic help?
If that is not the case, is Democracy always potentially flawed?
>>13517039
>>13517002
>>13517126
significant ^^^
the original twitter link? unable to locate at the moment
I downloaded the Don jr on Jen comment yesterday