JovanHuttonPulitzer ™ #JovanHuttonPulitzer

@JovanHPulitzer

From an "OP" view (observed process) why is the use of color so important? Color serves a very important function in a risk limiting, high accountability and ultimate transparent operation. Learn why Color is important and sometimes teams are colored coded.

https://twitter.com/JovanHPulitzer/status/1386755494975508489

#NewHampshire selects an operative who said all election fraud claims are fake and worked to try to get #Arizona shut down. Look at his letter to Arizona and New Hampshire thinks this guy is their man? He selects TWO federally funded Universities? This IS THE BROKEN SYSTEM!

https://twitter.com/JovanHPulitzer/status/1387069235113963527

Fauci’s NIAID Scientists Attended Wuhan Lab Summit, Now WIPED From The Internet

In addition to funding research groups collaborating with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Dr. Anthony Fauci also approved National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases researchers’ attendance at a conference sponsored by the lab believed by many to be the source of COVID-19.

The 2016 Conference on Viral Infection and Immune Response, hosted by the Nature science journal, has been scrubbed from publication’s website, but The National Pulse has located archived versions of the site. We also saved the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s (WIV) press release. Two researchers from Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) were in attendance at the 2016 event which discussed emerging viral diseases, infections and antiviral immunity – all critical to the COVID-19 response. Dr. Fauci has served as Director of the institute since 1984 and remains the highest paid U.S. government employee despite a bevy of false prognostications and outright lies.

At the time of the conference, attendee Kanta Subbarao served as Chief of the NIAID’s Emerging Respiratory Viruses Section and Nancy Sullivan served as Chief of the Biodefense Research Section at the NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center. Sullivan still serves under Fauci while Subbarao departed the agency to become Director of the World Health Organization’s Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza. The October conference contained six sessions: epidemiology of emerging viral disease, persistent viral infection and immune dysregulation, viral pathogenesis, immune intervention and prevention of disease, innate antiviral immunity, and induction of systemic adaptive immunity. Among its organizers and speakers were several researchers from Chinese Communist Party institutions, including the current Director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and WIV Director-General.

The WIV also has a close relationship with the Chinese Communist Party, signing agreements for “All-around cooperation” with Chinese Communist Party city-level governments. Researchers have also been granted awards from the Chinese Communist Party’s Youth League and the State Council. The lab has also televised the National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party. A WIV press release recounts: “During watching of live broadcast, the conference hall was in perfect order. Everyone’s listening carefully to work report by General Secretary Hu Jintao and keeping notes attentively. The atmosphere was charged with excitement and the room was resounded with waves of applause.” The conference follows reports revealing that Fauci’s NIH sent millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund research carried out by EcoHealth Alliance, the U.S. partner of the WIV. The NIAID funded six separate grants totaling nearly $3,750,000 focusing on “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” in China.

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/fauci-scientists-attended-wuhan-lab-conference/

https://web.archive.org/web/20160624012022/http://www.nature.com/natureconferences/viir2016/speakers.html

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1713-3056

https://www.doherty.edu.au/people/dr-kanta-subbarao

https://web.archive.org/web/20160417001614/http://www.nature.com/natureconferences/viir2016/program.html

https://reporter.nih.gov/search/GCBvbhJJPEOJ8Rp15r1W1A/project-details/9320765

Audit looks like it will be starting for the day soon.

https://azaudit.org/

Liberal push to expand Supreme Court is all but dead among Hill Dems

Senate Republicans are still seizing on the issue in the lead-up to the 2022 midterms.

Supreme Court expansion was one of the left’s most galvanizing ideas during the 2020 Democratic primary. But the idea is going nowhere with sitting Democratic senators. “I don’t think the American public is interested in having the Supreme Court expanded,” said Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.). Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who represents a particularly valuable swing state, said “the more responsible thing to do is to keep it at nine justices.” And Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) said she opposes “adding seats that politicize the court.” That trio is facing reelection in 2022, making their opinions particularly important to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). But as Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) formally pushes for high court expansion, resurfacing the popular progressive cause in response to the GOP’s relentless drive to fill court seats during the Trump years, it’s clear that few of Markey’s colleagues agree with him. While liberal measures on election reform, police bias and congressional ethics remain relatively popular with the 50-member Senate majority, expanding the Supreme Court is close to dead among the chamber’s Democrats. “This is in the category of things that couldn’t muster 50 votes and probably couldn’t muster 40 votes,” said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). “We have a historic opportunity to make change here and we should focus on those issues where we can get a majority.” Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said adding seats is a topic that the media and Republicans like to talk about but one that’s got no traction in the Senate. “Somebody’s introduced a bill,” he said. “We’re focused on Covid and infrastructure.”

The idea of expanding the Supreme Court became a liberal cause celebré after Republicans confirmed three Supreme Court justices during former President Donald Trump's term. Markey’s proposal, introduced with Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) and Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.), would increase the number of justices to 13 from 9. The number of Supreme Court justices has changed seven times in U.S. history, ranging from five to 10, but has stayed at nine since the late 19th century. With a 6-3 conservative majority on the high court poised to influence rulings for a generation, progressives say that now is the time to act. They’re betting that pressure on Democratic lawmakers will increase as the court hands down more decisions that are unpopular with the party's base. “The momentum for this effort is going to grow. Especially if the court does drift dramatically, in a direction which is overturning progressive precedent after progressive precedent,” Markey insisted in an interview.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has said she has no plans to bring the high court expansion bill to the floor, and its prospects are equally dim in the Senate. But growing or otherwise reforming the Supreme Court nevertheless became a litmus test for the left during last year's Democratic presidential primaries. Even though Biden never supported the idea, several candidates said they’d be open to it, including now-Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/04/26/liberals-expand-supreme-court-democrats-484562

Arizona Republican Party

@AZGOP

Despite legal threats from the Democrats, "America's Audit" continues. Arizona Republican Chairwoman @kelliwardaz

talks with Audit Director Ken Bennett regarding the audit progress and non-partisan approach. What's got the Democrats so panicked? One word: TRANSPARENCY

#AZAudit

https://twitter.com/AZGOP/status/1386865897134989314

FISA court doc shows FBI looked for domestic terrorists without warrants, report

The FBI’s warrant-free queries were related to criminal investigations including those on domestic terrorism.

The FBI has without court orders looked through troves of National Security Agency foreign communications for information on American "racially motivated violent extremists," according to a news report based on a recently declassified report. The agency conducted the reviews despite being warned several years ago by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which approves warrants for such investigations, that such inquiries were constitutionally alarming, according to the Daily Beast. The FBI’s warrant-free queries, known as backdoor searches, were related to criminal investigations including those on "domestic terrorism involving racially motivated violent extremists."

The court's Judge James E. Boasberg found what he referred to as "apparent widespread violations of the querying standard." Seven FBI field offices were implicated in violations, according to a November 18, 2020 FISA Court opinion declassified Monday and signed by Boasberg, the Daily Beast also reports. An FBI analyst once ran a multi-search-term "batch query" on Americans "in connection with predicated criminal investigations relating to domestic terrorism" that returned 33 foreign-surveillance results, the Daily Beast also reports.

The expansion of surveillance in 2008, known as Section 702, is largely based on permitting NSA to intercept communications from suspected terrorists, the U.S. has only designated foreign entities as terrorists, not domestic ones. In an opinion released in 2019, the FISA Court warned the FBI that its backdoor searches were potentially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects people on U.S. soil against unreasonable government searches and seizures, also according to the Daily Beast.

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/fisa-court-docs-show-fbi-looked-domestic-terrorists-without-warrants-report

Additonal Sauces:

Secret Court Reveals: FBI Hunted for Domestic Terrorists Without a Warrant

https://www.thedailybeast.com/secret-court-reveals-fbi-hunted-for-domestic-terrorists-without-a-warrant

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/09/nsa-loophole-warrantless-searches-email-calls