Anonymous ID: ebdad5 April 27, 2021, 2:18 p.m. No.13526543   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6566 >>6607 >>6706

https://www.wsj.com/articles/want-that-job-offer-a-covid-19-vaccine-is-now-required-11619438580

 

I am calling "bullsh&t" regarding this story by "Chip Cutter" (real name?!). I live in the real world surrounded by real people. Even people who have gotten those poison injections are in some cases, wondering why they did. Not only that but the level of side effects and permanent disabilities are horrific if the reports are to be believed.

 

So..to all the "poopy" (trying so hard to remain polite!) employers who think it is okay to coerce compliance with experimental gene therapies as a condition of employment I'd like to ask just one thing: If your assumption that the vaccines are "safe and effective" turns out to be wrong and you kill or disable (or put at risk of "COVID") a good percentage of your workforce where does that leave you?

 

PS. I don't believe the hype about mandated vaccines. I think a lot of people will resist this with disastrous effects for the companies trying to impose it.

Anonymous ID: ebdad5 April 27, 2021, 2:30 p.m. No.13526603   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6607 >>6712 >>6724 >>6756 >>6762 >>6775

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/man-hospitalized-blood-clots-johnson-johnson-vaccine/?itm_term=home

 

I don't think a lot of anons are at risk of getting a "COVID" vaccine. However, I'd like to present a PSA (public service announcement) to anyone thinking about one. The MSM will not present you with usable information about vaccine risks. That does not mean there aren't any. This piece, courtesy of Children's Health Defense gives some information about blood clotting and "COVID" vaccines. It doesn't seem like it's only an issue with J&J or AstraZeneca, btw.