Anonymous ID: 546d0a April 27, 2021, 4:27 p.m. No.13527430   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13527374

5 hours… he could have said it in 15 minutes. and there is a ton of confirmation bias, taking text out of context, conclusions based on a book talking about something and then saying the book/author supports what was discussed. with that logic, the bible supports Lucifer and Satan. He didn't after cherry picking text on the page, he didn't even bother to take the text off the the screen shot that says the opposite of what he is pushing.

And he spent half the video with his own eye covered and still wears the devil looking goatee. according to his logic he is telling us what his religion is.

I suspect he is mocking Christians, just like the video is about, but who will ever know.

Anonymous ID: 546d0a April 27, 2021, 4:35 p.m. No.13527485   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13527349

no need, i found it on my own. you missed the point. the artical title has nothing to do with the video that is currently attached to it. unless you were the one who took the screenshot or was on that page before the screen shot was taken, you have no idea what was there when then screen shot was taken.

on the other hand, the title does match the video for years ago, so it is not out of the realm of possibility that when the story was posted, they originally posted the old video that matched their headline.

in either case the headline is not fake and gay other than they have no video to back it up.