https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1387150700849811460

Joe Kent for WA-3 Retweeted

Rudy W. Giuliani

@RudyGiuliani

'''3 minutes every American NEEDS to watch! There is a CONCERTED EFFORT to corrupt our children.

@robbystarbuck

says "the Left understands the mere-exposure effect", watch this video to see what he means.'''

Catch our full conversation on Apple Podcasts here:

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/satanic-shoes-marketed-to-kids-concerted-effort-to/id1505388703?i=1000515261187

2:04 PM · Apr 27, 2021·Twitter Media Studio

911 Retweets 68 Quote Tweets 1,817 Likes

>>13533303

full video on rumble and rudygiulianics.com

SATANIC SHOES Marketed To KIDS? A CONCERTED EFFORT To Corrupt Children | Robby Starbuck | Ep. 124

Rudy Giuliani's Common Sense Published March 31, 2021 23,554 Views

https://rumble.com/vf8qjj-satanic-shoes-marketed-to-kids-a-concerted-effort-to-corrupt-children-robby.html

https://rudygiulianics.com/category/2021-podcasts/

https://rudygiulianics.com/

https://twitter.com/RyanGirdusky/status/1387129966761070595

Joe Kent for WA-3 Retweeted

Ryan James Girdusky

@RyanGirdusky

A study by the Cato Institute found that 75% of Americans want either no immigration or low levels.

https://twitter.com/CatoPress/status/1387051997673660434

Quote Tweet

Cato Press

@CatoPress

· Apr 27

Only 9% of Americans want zero immigration into the United States today. Instead, 91% welcome immigration, including 68% who favor a “low level” and 23% who prefer a “high level” of immigration. #CatoPolls

Show this thread

Cato Press

@CatoPress

·

Apr 27

Replying to

@CatoPress

Fifty‐nine percent (59%) of Republicans say citizens should be able to directly vote on immigration levels and origins. However, two‐thirds (65%) of Democrats disagree. Independents are evenly divided. #CatoPolls

Cato Press

@CatoPress

·

Apr 27

Americans say the better solution to illegal immigration is simplifying the legal immigration process (56%); fewer think increasing border security and a border wall is the better approach (43%). A majority (55%) also favor a pathway to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants.

Cato Press

@CatoPress

·

Apr 27

58% of strong liberals and 49% of liberals have unfavorable views of immigrants if they join the Republican party. In a similar fashion, 72% of strong conservatives and 55% of conservatives have unfavorable views of Democratic immigrants. #CatoPolls

Cato Press

@CatoPress

·

Apr 27

Majorities of Republicans (80%), Democrats (65%), first‐generation immigrants (72%), second‐generation immigrants (63%), and the third generation and higher (71%) favor a “melting pot of cultures” rather than immigrants maintaining distinct cultures in the U.S. #CatoPolls

Cato Press

@CatoPress

·

Apr 27

Majorities of Americans say it is either “extremely” or “very” important to them that immigrants (1) be loyal to Americans and the U.S. (71%), (2) be self‐reliant (69%), and (3) speak English fluently (53%). Democrats and Republicans disagree about assimilation preferences.

Cato Press

@CatoPress

·

Apr 27

About a quarter (28%) of Americans view themselves more as a “global citizen than as a citizen of the United States,” and 58% of strong liberals agree. In contrast, 71% of strong conservatives view themselves first as U.S. citizens. #CatoPolls

Cato Press

@CatoPress

cont:

>>13533397

cont:

entire thread and twitter comments: https://twitter.com/CatoPress/status/1387051997673660434

·

Apr 27

First‐generation immigrants are more likely than the third generation and higher to say that others presumed they were not American, confused them for a store employee where they didn’t work, called them racial slurs, or made negative comments about the food they ate. #CatoPolls

Cato Press

@CatoPress

·

Apr 27

An overwhelming majority (80%) of immigrants say they feel grateful to be Americans. Most first‐ and second‐generation immigrants say their families came to the U.S. for economic opportunities (53%) and freedom (29%). #CatoPolls

>>13533397

>>13533406

KT

@augradkt

·

Apr 27

Replying to

@CatoPress

Could have just written “Almost 70% of Americans want low level immigration”

Cato Press

@CatoPress

·

Apr 27

THREAD: A new

@CatoInstitute

national survey seeks to explore and examine why Americans support or oppose a more open immigration regime. https://cato.org/survey-reports/e-pluribus-unum-findings-cato-institute-2021-immigration-identity-national-survey #CatoPolls #CatoImmigration

>>13533397

>>13533437

https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/e-pluribus-unum-findings-cato-institute-2021-immigration-identity-national-survey

E Pluribus Unum: Findings from the Cato Institute 2021 Immigration and Identity National Survey

'The survey of 2,600 U.S. adults seeks to explore and examine why Americans support or oppose a more open immigration regime.

APRIL 27, 2021 • SURVEY REPORTS

Who Wants to Increase, Decrease, or Keep Immigration the Same? A Profile of Immigration Expanders, Maintainers, and Restrictionists

Demographic profiles of Expanders, Maintainers, and Restrictionists

Restrictionists: Immigration Restrictionists are more likely than immigration Expanders to be White American (77% vs. 61%) and somewhat less likely to be African American (9% vs. 12%), Latino (8% vs. 17%), or Asian American (3% vs. 7%). They tend to be older (with 55% vs. 35% over the age of 55) and are less likely to have college degrees (22% vs. 36%). They have moderate incomes and are about half as likely as Expanders to earn more than $100,000 annually (12% vs. 20%). They are more likely than Expanders to live in less populated areas (42% vs. 21% live in a small town or rural area). They are somewhat more likely to live in the Midwest (23% vs. 19%) and South (38% vs. 33%). Restrictionists also are more likely to identify as conservative (62% vs. 14%) as well as independent (33% vs. 21%) and Republican (44% vs. 12%).

Expanders: Immigration Expanders are mostly White American (61%) but are more likely to be African American (12% vs. 9%), Latino (17% vs. 8%), and Asian American (7% vs. 3%) than Restrictionists are. Expanders are more likely than Restrictionists to have a college degree (36% vs. 22%) including post‐​graduate degrees (17% vs. 8%) and higher incomes (20% vs. 12% earn more than $100,000 annually). Expanders also tend to be younger (56% vs. 45% are under 45). They generally live in more densely populated areas (50% vs. 25% live in a city) They are somewhat more likely to live in the Northeast (20% vs. 17%) and West (28% vs. 22%). Expanders are more likely to identify as liberal (49% vs. 7%) and as Democrats (60% vs. 13%).

Maintainers: Those who want to maintain immigration levels are similar in some ways to Expanders and in other ways to Restrictionists. Like Expanders, Maintainers are more racially diverse (61% White, 13% Black, 19% Latino, and 6% Asian American) than Restrictionists. But like Restrictionists, Maintainers are less likely than Expanders to have college degrees (24%). A plurality of Maintainers identifies as politically moderate (39%) and Democratic (39%). The remainder are split between identifying as conservative (32%) and liberal (22%).

These three groups differ in their level of social trust, with Restrictionists the least trustful of others. Restrictionists (73%) are the most likely to agree that you “can’t be too careful in dealing with people,” followed by 69% of Maintainers. Expanders are least likely to agree (57%) that most people can’t be trusted.

Expanders are more likely to know many immigrants personally. Nearly two‐​thirds (62%) say they know “a lot” or “some” immigrants. Restrictionists are about 20 points less likely to say they know many immigrants (44%). Maintainers fall in between, with 50% saying they know many immigrants. Furthermore, Expanders are much more likely to personally be first‐ or second‐​generation immigrants (35%) compared to Restrictionists (13%) and Maintainers (25%). Similarly, Expanders are more than twice as likely as Restrictionists to be fluent in another language besides English (44% vs. 20%).

cont:

>>13533457

>>13533397

cont: Who Wants to Increase, Decrease, or Keep Immigration the Same? A Profile of Immigration Expanders, Maintainers, and Restrictionists

In their own words, quotes from Expanders, Maintainers, and Restrictionists:

Expanders:

In a few words, can you explain why you’d prefer to increase immigration?

Immigrants enrich our country by bringing new experiences, beliefs, and foods. Most of them have a strong work ethic and truly want to make America a better place. We need to create a better path for citizenship.

My grandparents were immigrants and so were so many I grew up with. If immigration was not happening then, I wouldn’t live in this country now.

This country is founded and almost entirely populated by immigrants and the descendants of immigrants. You can’t just come inside and lock the door behind you.

Recent immigrants and noncitizens contribute more and commit fewer crimes than the average of all U.S. residents. They make our nation more economically competitive. Most refugees trying to immigrate are fleeing conditions the U.S. created. We owe them asylum and a path to citizenship.

There are people trying to immigrate to America because they are seeking asylum, are in danger, or want a better life for their families. America is in a position to help, and immigrants help stimulate the economy.

Immigration is good for the economy, it brings young dynamic entrepreneurs with a strong work ethic. Our population is getting older. We need more young people to add to the tax base and contribute to Social Security.

Maintainers

In a few words, can you explain why you’d prefer to keep immigration at its present level?

The current level of immigration has proven to be sustainable while having a generally positive impact on the national economy. Changing this level has the potential to alter some of these variables and break the equilibrium.

Keeping immigration at the current level will ensure that the country has the infrastructure in place to assimilate new migrants (process entry, availability of basic needs) and keep the borders secure.

A controlled flow is healthy—our country should welcome immigrants who come through legal means.

I think that immigration is great; our nation grows stronger when it consists of citizens of diverse beliefs and backgrounds. However, the U.S. doesn’t really take care of all of its citizens as it is, so I don’t really think immigration should increase right now.

The USA cannot provide jobs for 100% of its citizens and residents as is. More legal immigration means more unemployed people collecting government assistance.

Immigrants need to assimilate into American society, but huge influxes always seem to end up with people in enclaves where they don’t learn English. Also, too many coming in on visas take work from citizens because businesses are allowed to hire them for less. We can’t flood the hiring market with visa holders. Note, I am talking about LEGAL immigration. Illegal immigration must be stopped.

I think in general, the government needs to take time to be more cautious about who they are letting into the country. I’m not talking about race, religion, sexual preference, etc. I’m advocating a more thorough vetting system.

Restrictionists

cont:

>>13533397

>>13533467

cont: Who Wants to Increase, Decrease, or Keep Immigration the Same? A Profile of Immigration Expanders, Maintainers, and Restrictionists

In a few words, can you explain why you’d prefer to decrease immigration?

We are not here to solve society’s problems in other countries or rescue the world. Each country should take care of its own. When each small unit is healthy, the whole is healthy. Healthy families make healthy communities, which make healthy states, which make a healthy country. Teach other countries to get rid of corruption and enable citizens to manage their own lives while providing some basic structure. Let each country be unique.

[Immigration should be decreased] because millions upon millions of people from south of the border have invaded our country and have not assimilated, instead turning us into the countries they left.

[Immigration should be decreased] because our country cannot financially sustain an infinite amount of immigrants. Further, the Democratic Party is only in favor of packing our country with illegal immigrants for votes. Highly immoral.

I don’t have a problem with immigration as long as it’s done legally.

If you go through legal immigration and can contribute to society, you are more than welcome. If you are trying to illegally enter our country, you should be turned away. And we should not take refugees from countries that we know hate us.

Most current immigrants are low‐​skill workers who will require welfare, Medicaid, and social assistance. This drives down the wages of low‐​skilled American citizens and reduces the amount of benefits available to help our own citizens.

Several illegal immigrants have been convicted of dangerous crimes in my state. Many support the cartel. Also, they come to live free off hard‐​working American taxpayers’ dollars. Safety and security are the main reasons.

By Emily Ekins and David Kemp

https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/e-pluribus-unum-findings-cato-institute-2021-immigration-identity-national-survey>>13533397

>>13533397

good read:

https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/e-pluribus-unum-findings-cato-institute-2021-immigration-identity-national-survey#americans-preferences-immigration-levels

in report:

70% of Democrats Say Racist Beliefs Drive Desire for Less Immigration

Democrats stand out, however, with 70% saying that racist beliefs motivate demand for less immigration. In contrast 60% of independents and 88% of Republicans believe intentions are sincere. There’s a racial divide as well. White Americans (61%) are more likely to believe motives are sincere, while a majority (56%) of African Americans think it’s driven by racism. Latino and Asian Americans are divided in half about whether motives are racist or sincere.

91% of Americans Welcome Immigration to U.S., 9% Want to Shut Down the Border

53% Say Ability to Immigrate Is a Human Right, But Few Want Fully Open Borders

72% of Strong Liberals Support Open Borders

72% Prefer Less Immigration if More Immigration Reduces Government Services

Americans Estimate That 40% of the U.S. Is Foreign‐​Born

Americans Want to Maintain or Increase Immigration Levels across World Regions; Some Are More Cautious of Latin American Immigration

What Americans Think about Illegal Immigration

55% Support a Pathway to Citizenship for Unauthorized Immigrants

56% Say Simplifying Legal Immigration Is the Better Way to Deal with Illegal Immigration

41% Believe Some Immigrants Illegally Enter or Stay in the U.S. Because of the Difficult Legal Immigration Process

Americans Estimate 50% of Latino Immigrants and 29% of Asian Immigrants Are Undocumented

68% of Strong Liberals Say It is “Acceptable” to Illegally Immigrate to the U.S.

58% of Republicans Say Children of Undocumented Should Not Attend U.S. Public Schools

61% of Republicans Oppose Birthright Citizenship for Children of Unauthorized Immigrants

58% of Republicans Support Stripping Citizenship of U.S.-Born Children of Undocumented Parents

69% of Republicans, 52% of Independents Support Deporting an Immigrant Who Dislikes America and Thinks Americans Are Racist

KEEP READING HERE: https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/e-pluribus-unum-findings-cato-institute-2021-immigration-identity-national-survey#how-americans-feel-toward-immigrants

>>13533397

>>13533403

watch the water watertown clinton street wont be able to walk down the street

>>13533423

>>13533403

>>13533873

advised to stay away from clinton and surrounding

>>13533423

all is very comms -ish-

may not even really be a shooter in the gun sense???

may be related to other events re: vote fraud perhaps?

actively searching for the shooter.

>>13533888

>>13533873

>>13533403

>>13533423

why are these shootings often in TOWNS

watertown newtown

>>13533692

strange right

like they are all part of a club

>>13533460

purple just happens to show up

the officer with the big gun

PURPLE COMMS

his tie

just like HRC and cabal always does

>WATERTOWN — Local law enforcement has confirmed that people were shot inside 145 Clinton St. on Wednesday afternoon following emergency dispatch reports that two people were shot.

>>13533971

>>13533971

>>13533460

>>13533971

>>13533974