Anonymous ID: e646aa April 30, 2021, 4:15 a.m. No.13548571   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8573 >>8579 >>8854

To those who look at the qlock-

I don't think Q ever acknowledged the clock, amirite?

If the qlock the clockfags devised was good, wouldn't Q have at least once acknowledged it?

It seems to me that the clock Q referred to is not the same as the one Anons have created.

It could be the key to 'you have more than you know'

And we are yet to figure it out

There have been more than several ideas for the official 'clock'

But we have to consider and realize that the more we know, the more the enemy knows.

So if we were to figure it out, the enemy would be able to figure it out.

So it can't be something as simple as what clockfags have come up with.

 

These are just valid points.

I really do hope we actually have more than we know.

It's just not what we currently have.

Anonymous ID: e646aa April 30, 2021, 4:27 a.m. No.13548599   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8606 >>8607

>>13548579

I'm not sure what to think at this point.

Trying to stay neutral and not allow any extra variables to enter the thought space.

Why would Q mention a clock or a map unless it was at least somewhat discernible?

All I know so far is the qclock draws a lot of speculation.

We're not here for speculation. We're here for facts.

And a lot of decodes involve really stretching the imagination and believing things that aren't concretely true.

I bet the solution is more simple than it seems

Anonymous ID: e646aa April 30, 2021, 4:35 a.m. No.13548620   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8633 >>8718

>>13548607

How easy would it be to complete a 10k piece puzzle if you were given just the randomized pieces and no box with the picture?

 

How quickly would you know what the image was supposed to be with only a few connections randomly throughout the image?

 

I'm looking for the cheat sheet