the skeptic will say 'we don't know' as a matter of course.
anyone who insists it is . . . and starts to badger about it . . . is not being a friendly anon.
and too often it's has the form of a set up.
the rule: it can not be reported as without the tripcode as part of the header for the post even if Q posts as the same ID further down (or above) in the bread.
so it's not a Q drop.
end of story.
that's not saying it isn't from the team.
the word 'normal' is about a very particular mathamatical concept
Normal in other definitions needs a context, you provide none.
'very strange' too, and you could have given examples.
conclusion: vauge statement of fearporn by a one-post IP hopper.
he also pissed in your drinking water , and will tell you "be a man, you don't need a filter"?
when the post has a statement of assignment for me as some random thought of an agency creep, I stop reading. And I filter that person.
the reason: their assignment about me is off base and it's insertion spam for operational conditioning.
I learned this a long time ago.
they like to brag and boast about how 'effective' their methods are.
but remember: they are liars through and through.
the are slaves in a no win game.
they are the people that they are tasked to watch out for.
nightmare scinario: the agency people are tasked with arresting themselves!
poster attacks verifying it as a bully.
verification that yes, it posted fear porn?
if it were a real anon they wouldn't be a bully like this.