>>1355581

Ok, thank you, appreciate the clarification. Sorry to post twice!

>>1355583

>You talking about corporation searches on SOS sites?

Yes. It's public information, BO & BV are ok with public info, so I got the answer and know where the line is.

The reason I asked is because that corporate info leads to connections between people - this is how we map their connections. Like Littlesis.com shows, using this public info how people are connected to each other, maybe as alumni, or other associations together and the wives are on boards of directors together and were in the same sorority (again public info).

This is how the Muckety Maps are made - same info, all public. Those can be so enormous and overwhelming, but are also a fantastic resource for this type of public, open-source info. We can use that and map the connections between people we are interested in and present it in a much less cluttered & overwhelming way, but simplified & clear. That way it is digestible to the average person.

>>1355652

The fire rises, brother.

Seriously though, I remember that. And considering who watches the board, the various interests involved, the topics, pushes & nudges that Q gives us and what we uncover are duly noted. While impatientfags and muh timetable fags cry, serious people look at what we dig up and make connections. Sometimes connections that we don't make even between disparate bits we find. We hope that /ourguys/ investigating are using it, and know /badguys/ see it. We will see the results publicly (resignations, arrests, suicides) or it will be part of the 60%. But whether we see it being used or not, it's noticed. It's valuable, even if we don't see the value at the moment.

It is really such an honor to participate, at any level in this undertaking.

>>1355697

Another person posted about Genie Oil company who has a stake in keeping Syria's Golan out of Syria's hands (Israel currently occupies) - so they definitely benefit from the "tensions" and keeping Syria weak so it cannot take back its rightful clay and the resources on (and under) it. Of course they are "worried" kek

>>1355812

Interdasting. Who is she that Assad follows and RTs her?

>>1355834

Considering none of us can be here 24/7 and gather everything and make the correct connections, we must count on the fact that it is being noticed, collated and used by /ourguys/ in some way.

It really is magical (in a good way).

>>1355879

Parallel construction term has been used but I think you are more right - there may be an inkling, there may not be enough for probable cause -OR- there may be something that, hypothetically, /ourguys/ want to look into but their superior says no. Well?

What happens if a bunch of rowdy autists happen to get a wild hair and dig up that very info? What happens if that info just happens to fall into their lap? They didn't technically disobey their superior's directive, they didn't use any .gov time or funds to gather it, it just happened to appear!

This occurred to me and has nagged me ever since watching the True Detectives series during PG (what would I do if I needed that info but wasn't allowed to go get it on 'company time' with .gov funds?)

And once that info falls into their lap, well they have to verify it, right? If it's compelling enough, how can the supervisor say no and not be suspicious as fuck? I think that is what happened with the /goodfbi/ during some cases (remember FBIanon fondly, hope he's ok) so we now are hearing/reading about the chicanery within that agency. Good agents made records of that fuckery!

That's all conjecture and may be wildly off the mark, but that's what I wonder about.

>>1355884

So that stupid whore is reduced to her bewbs, for showing them to a bunch of people on the internet just because they asked her to, to get attention, proving true our point.

Well played.