Anonymous ID: 019071 May 1, 2021, 2:01 a.m. No.13555898   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5932 >>5936 >>5985

Our power to understanding ratio is way off the charts.

 

I think nuclear weapons and our saturation of the planet in electromagnetic energy have potential to be recognized in the future as the species two largest blunders.

 

I have no idea if our wireless transmissions are bad for us and nobody else really does either, which is a huge problem.

 

No person alive has lived totally free from artificial EM waves. The effects on our bodies and minds are almost totally unknown. We don’t even understand how we work at anything approaching a fundamental level, how the hell can we understand how this stuff affects us?

 

We stupid.

Anonymous ID: 019071 May 1, 2021, 2:13 a.m. No.13555935   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5960 >>6009 >>6015 >>6037 >>6547

QUESTION

 

Despite Fauci's corrupt medical history Trump still appointed him to advise on the management of infectious diseases.

 

Then later Trump played political theater acting like he's against Fauci all while allowing untested vaccines to be used through executive order.

Fauci has been pushing Trump's executive order vaccines.

 

Why?

Anonymous ID: 019071 May 1, 2021, 2:35 a.m. No.13556003   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6017 >>6045

>>13555985

 

WHAT BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS CAN BE CAUSED BY RF ENERGY?

 

Biological effects can result from exposure to RF energy. Biological effects that result from heating of tissue by RF energy are often referred to as "thermal" effects. It has been known for many years that exposure to very high levels of RF radiation can be harmful due to the ability of RF energy to heat biological tissue rapidly. This is the principle by which microwave ovens cook food. Exposure to very high RF intensities can result in heating of biological tissue and an increase in body temperature. Tissue damage in humans could occur during exposure to high RF levels because of the body's inability to cope with or dissipate the excessive heat that could be generated. Two areas of the body, the eyes and the testes, are particularly vulnerable to RF heating because of the relative lack of available blood flow to dissipate the excess heat load.

 

At relatively low levels of exposure to RF radiation, i.e., levels lower than those that would produce significant heating, the evidence for production of harmful biological effects is ambiguous and unproven. Such effects, if they exist, have been referred to as "non-thermal" effects. A number of reports have appeared in the scientific literature describing the observation of a range of biological effects resulting from exposure to low levels of RF energy. However, in most cases, further experimental research has been unable to reproduce these effects. Furthermore, since much of the research is not done on whole bodies (in vivo), there has been no determination that such effects constitute a human health hazard. It is generally agreed that further research is needed to determine the generality of such effects and their possible relevance, if any, to human health. In the meantime, standards-setting organizations and government agencies continue to monitor the latest experimental findings to confirm their validity and determine whether changes in safety limits are needed to protect human health.

 

https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/electromagnetic-compatibility-division/radio-frequency-safety/faq/rf-safety#:~:text=It%20has%20been%20known%20for,to%20heat%20biological%20tissue%20rapidly.&text=Exposure%20to%20very%20high%20RF,an%20increase%20in%20body%20temperature.