https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKHUaNAxsTg
t;his is falseTOTALLY FALSE
A mass ratio proton to electron
?
I was referring to speed of light and Big G
As far as I know there's a lack of knowledge as to exactly how everything "works" on the molecular level? To me it's hand waving.. "That's how it works"?
The models are too small to observe directly so how would the mathematics behind it be verified?
Is that what physicists are supposedly doing at CERN?
The answers might be much more simple and plain?
"What else are they lying about?"
So much whacky "information" that people accept, when the answer is right in their face;
People have dismissed Sheldrake's work for decades.. Many instances of the same rejection of the new in the history of science.
"never been detected"
Learn Logic?
Lack of evidence is different from evidence of lack. They are different.
No evidence doesn't equal evidence.
in any case.
Rupert Sheldrake
There are many alleged constants and if even one is shown to fluctuate then the axiom of orthodox science world-view to wit : "constants of Nature never change" would be false.