Anonymous ID: f4e455 May 1, 2021, 9:47 p.m. No.13561750   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1784

>>13561512

 

Looks like it's Trump's boys who are going after Kerry. I think a Kerry take down would open a fissure that would expose the whole festering dem mess. Kerry's essentially an Obama/Jarrett/Bidan bag man, if you ask me. Taking Kerry off the board now will be better than going directly after Bidan. A Kerry take down will expose Bidan, and it will just look like collateral damage, so sad.

 

My guess is this is why Obama/Jarrett/Bidan told the feds to get Rudy's stuff. Kerry's son was involved with the Biden's in the Ukraine, AFAIK, and Rudy has that info. Obama/Jarrett/Bidan didn't know what Rudy had, is my guess, and need it to figure out how to handle the Kerry fight.

 

Obama/Jarrett/Bidan do have the Hunter laptop info, already, which the feds supposedly lost, (cough, cough), so they didn't need that info. Taking possession would have opened that vector up again, too.

 

Might be Bidan himself will have to neutralize Kerry to save Hunter. That's where I think the Giuliani's were going by making public that the feds didn't want the Hunter hard drives, even when told about them. WTF, too, Rudy getting his stuff confiscated and he tells the feds they forgot some stuff? Boomerang coming?

 

Also remember Chanel Rion was with Rudy during the evidence collecting trip in the Ukraine. She has said she's seen the laptop material, as well. Trump pushed OAN the other day wrt to it's rise in the ratings. Not a coincidence,

 

Kerry's in the batter's box, atm, and he's going to get some high heat from trump's boys, I think.

Anonymous ID: f4e455 May 1, 2021, 10:05 p.m. No.13561805   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13561603

 

Images of the paper ballots, perhaps.

 

I think, as well, voting machines do an image after they scan. Might be they downloaded the ballot images off the voting machines and need the servers for storage of those, as well.

 

Jovan Hutton Pulitzer has said that the critical criteria in recognizing fake or fraudulent ballots is no fold marks (were never mailed), non-human pen marks in the voting bubble (won't have the characteristic pressure differences of pressing down and releasing pen) and ballots printed to intentionally misalign the voting bubble with the machine scanners (ballot would be rejected and have to be adjudicated).

 

Jovan says he has stuff that can determine this on images as well as the original paper.

 

I'm going with image storage for the servers. TPTB have a history of shredding ballots.