>>13563020

It is possible someone was able to trigger a hashed collision of UIDs. Though it would be very difficult, I imagine, to control when an opportunity to do so existed. You would need the ability to spoof a wide range of IPs to the server and one of those would have to collide to create the same UID on a bread that Q happens to post in.

Speaking of things I noticed, it was that the bots tried to keep an average bread flow rate of around a minimum of one bread every 2 hours in the ranges when Q was active. This would have served to narrow the useful window of such a setup and to make it more expensive to do so.

That said … It could also be that Q left 'unofficial drops' just to give the types who would try and invent them something to chew on. People are biased to presume favor on their part (else we would never take any risk and therefore never try to succeed in risk) - so when they see 'easy pickings' to satisfy their objective, particularly when it comes to social behaviors, they always assume it is the error of others, rather than part of a deliberate ploy intended just for what they are about to do.

>>13563057

I have to wonder how much of this is media framing.

We know that the media loves to make things up about what is going on in government to drive traffic and clicks. Political controversy saved them from the brink of bankruptcy last time around, orange man bad is last years' news, so now they need to irritate a different demographic - that is those of us who were for many of Trump's policies. They get us to click (and get irritated) when we see a report about Biden destroying something.

I have not yet read into this, but for an example - I would look to see if this was part of planned removal of the old wall in the first place (or wall sections rendered obsolete by the newer wall construction).

The media knows how to play to confirmation bias and to provoke tempers on all sides. Whether they are or are not cabal - they will always trend toward provoking the baser, visceral impulses of people to get their attention. Because that is how they make money.

"Nothing is as it seems."

"Look here, or here, the truth is behind you."

I take this to mean that one must keep in mind that almost everything we see is designed to grab our attention, and the truth of what is happening will very rarely be made obvious. This sounds like common sense - but it is wired into us to believe we have the upper hand and to trust our perception. The game of predator and prey is more nuanced, today, and the first to move/strike does not necessarily win.

>>13563189

Economists are not educated on the philosophy or realities of economics. They are educated to conduct themselves in accordance with the support of existing machinations.

Simply because you or I "don't know what we are talking about" does not mean anyone else, including those making the accusations, does.

You could always ask him a fun one - where is money created? Is it created by government spending, or is it created by bank loans? If it is created by bank loans, as he will no doubt answer, then why did bank deposits surpass loans this year?

While I have no doubt there is a "great reset" planned… I do not believe it is going to go quite as they anticipate. They are trying to coax "excess savings" out of the market and believe they can control the consequent inflation, not realizing the "savings" is not by the public, but by their rivals in large capital firms and elsewhere.

Rats on a ship meets bucket of crabs.