https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1388836304918614027

If you go to his Twitter account you will see that he's found information to suggest that having an immune response to the "spike protein" does not seem to be as protective as having an immune response to other parts of the "virus". If that's the case what was the reason they chose this antigen? (link: https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1388576508189544448 )

The linked thread indicates that the spike protein by itself can damage blood vessels. It would have been nice had vaccine researchers and developers paid attention to this prior to the rushed vaccination of millions upon millions of people.

>>13567072

Idk. It suggests they picked a poor choice of antigen for the vaccines, but I don't know enough about this subject to be sure.

Here's a link to a paper discussing the spike protein and the damage it can do.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2020/12/04/2020.12.04.409144.full.pdf

>>13567080

Asymmetrical warfare is all to our (free people's) advantage. We are individuals as well as part of humanity. CCP for example does not seem to be thinking clearly if it wants to wage asymmetrical warfare with a centralized organization.

If people around the world begin to understand they are IN an actual war it is already won. The situation will rapidly become like "herding cats". Millions upon millions of fairly autonomous fighting units in multiplied theaters of battle (ideas, social media, etc). However to the enemy's advantage they tried to hide the fact that we were being infiltrated from within.

Q really did something highly strategic sharing the "drops" with anons.