>>13567204 (PB) Archillect: DEW Comms?
Baker purposely antagonizes anons who disagreed with the sauceless DEW Twatter pic, by making title about DEWs. IJS making notes
>>13567730 (PB)
>Either way, anons are not allowed to bake.
>We haven't had a new Global in a while so >how about this one?:
>ATTN ANONS: If you have wanted to Bake >but felt you couldn't please speak up >immediately.
I wanted to bake lots of times, but felt like I couldn't, so I'm speaking up.