G'dEvenin Anons, shadilay
Fuck everyone else here per >>13568748
you're tiresome, but negligible.
Kek, anonymous ridiculing 'conspiracy theories in general'. Sounds a bit like a poorly thought out larp.
Im with both of you on this… you need grass roots, but.. military can't wait til EVERYONE is on board..
i mentioned before.. a rumor going around that mil is monitoring online chatter for support.. they're looking to pass a certain threshhold of estimated unique individuals who would support military intervention in political/corporate affairs.. I've heard all sorts of %fagging on the threshhold, but.. that's what we're for.. that's the whole point of this.. to continue to get people talking about the need for it.. Look at how other countries are having similar discussions about support for military intervention.. 2 cents, thanks
right but there could be any percentage, maybe a LARGE percentage that remain pretty neutral and just watch.. I've heard some people say "75%, then military acts" which… i feel 75% is asking a LOT for the common folk who don't research things and just worry about themselves and their own.. these are extremely confusing times.. its completely sane to be like "wtf is going on, I don't even know"
If even 30% of the population actually voiced sincere support online, I feel that would be enough… or I don't know, could be less or more..
I think mil intervention should be a specific public conversation.. you're not inciting violence, no one can argue that, you're saying "Green dept, please help, the citizens are asking for your help" and that is all.