Too wordy.
I gave up once I got to the bottom frame.
Anon has already grabbed the dough.
No, and I am not the anon who grabbed the dough.
>Grassley had typos yesterday
That being said, Grassley's twats usually read as if he has thrown a bunch of scrabble tiles into the air and then picked from them randomly.
I believe they are meant to be camels.
You have to remember that the average Dutch painter would never have seen a camel in the flesh.
Bear in mind that it was painted in 1562.
Having seen a camel, how would you describe it?
Well, it's kind of like a horse, only bigger, with a bigger body and hump on it's back and a much longer neck.
What do you see in the painting?