>#1702: Ex-Hostages Are Back From NK
courtesy of The Maestro
Ha! Queens Represent!
Good morning anon.
-
11 appears to be turning into the magic # for FREEDOM. (makes sense given its numerological significance + its tragic use in recent US history).
-
Screencapped that Q post on 11.20.17 for ya. Interesting enough, there was also one 21 seconds later.
Maybe a clue to the answer of:
How must people be made aware of an alternate reality?
is the line just before?
How many people are unaware of the ‘truth’ due to the stranglehold?
If the 'truth' is being smothered by what some call 'black magick' (i.e. manipulation of symbols/archetypes buried in the collective unconscious to alter mass perception),
perhaps the antidote to this is corresponding doses of 'white magic' (i.e. Q74, etc. etc. etc.). While, at the same time, revealing the magicians' "hidden hand" for those who choose to see, so that this power can be diffused across the population?
Make sense at all?
kek, that's a new one. chew on this, hater.
<<Nas - Queens Get the Money
You ain't as hot as I is
All of these false prophets is not messiahs
You don't know how high the sky is
The square mileage of Earth or what pi is
I'm the shaky hand that touched George Foreman in Zaire
The same hand that punched down devils that brought down the Towers
Did not. Get a screencap by chance?
Indeed. if you're interested in this intersection of "magic" and the "quantum theory of reality", sauce CHAOS Magick (a large part of Their playbook, esp. since the advent of "cyberspace" (ala JPB & RAW)).
>https://www.inventati.org/amprodias/txt/hacktivism/magickal.htm
The practice of magick is generally agreed to be the attempt to create change in conformity with the will of the magician.
Question is what % of the pop need to awaken to this reality before Their "spell" is completely broken? Does the 100th Monkey concept come into play here? That is to say, a critical mass of people, but under the 50.0001% we commonly consider as being representative of the majority? Perhaps the answer depends upon the strength of "the will of the magician"?
Something else to chew on re: this magic/science intersection:
>http://health.uottawa.ca/biomech/laws/clarkes.htm
In the book Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry into the Limits of the Possible Arthur C. Clarke states his three Laws, which are formulated as follows:
Clarke's First Law: "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."
Clarke's Second Law: "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
Clarke's Third Law: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
>12 charities — including Harvard, the Museum of Modern Art, the Council on Foreign Relations
To consider any one of those 3 – "charities" – is absurd on its very face.
Pretty much like D.Rock's entire life existence - absurd.
May the future not be kind to his absurd legacy.
As a sidenote, just discovered that there's a meme going around the interwebs that the book that Nikola Tesla is reading in this famous 1901 photo in front of the spiral coil of his high-frequency transformer at East Houston St. 46, New York is
<<< Roger Boskovich's book, “Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis,”
Haven't been able yet to track down the original source photo to verify the "claim" (photo credited to G.G. Bain, famous American news photographer)
>http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/ggbain/item/2014684845/
May or may not be true given the cabal's incessant attempts to highjack & pervert everything N.T.
a bit of sauce on Roger Boskovich:
>https://www.manresa-sj.org/stamps/1_Boscovich.htm
Roger Boscovich, born in what is now Dubrovnik, Croatia, was an astronomer, mathematician, physicist, geometer, and philosopher, a Fellow of the British Royal Society, and a priest of the Society of Jesus. He studied and worked mostly at the Roman College. After the Suppression of the Jesuits, he was invited by King Louis XV of France to become Director of Optics for the Marine, an office established for him personally.
Thanks for the news. Found a BIG Sloppy mistake in "Breitbart"'s article:
>gesture of goodwill ahead of an upcoming summit between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, now planned for the island nation of Singapore.
It's Kim-Jong UN, not ~~Kim Jong-il~~ (his father, the totalitarian asshole).
Sloppy, but honest mistake or Sloppy & his boys playing silly tricks again?
Any twatter anon's around? Could you please twat @BreitbartNews and inform them (nicely, as they are a bit overly sensitive to criticism) of their error and ask them to correct?
Important sauce tying together past/present/possible future.
Rothbard is a very underappreciated historian to this day, imo.
>>1356490 #1790
>anons don't think there is a connection worth digging here.
Not this anon. Thanks for the good devil's chessboard piece.
>>1356546 Agree.
>>1356629 Used to think same. But you'd be surprised how many citizens have not a clue about the Dulles brothers.
Maybe anons. do, but maybe it's still good fodder for memes to the masses?
They are a fulcrum for so much of the fuckery that started pre/during/post WWII, and yet they are ghosts to most Americans. Unfortunate.
Planting seeds is a wonderful metaphor.
Lately, have been dropping subtle Q hints in normal conversation (e.g. JUSTICE, PLAY, AWAKENING). Avoid any sort of "political" discussion (given the audience).
If DJT comes up, usually highlight the Queens connection. If resistance, shift to another topic entirely and continue dropping Q seeds. bob & weave, quick jab, bob & weave.
hope this helps.
Always intrigued by anything N.T., but experience has shown me that too far off tangent quickly turns into a slide, and anons. get (rightfully) pissed off, and then avoid him altogether. So ultimately counterproductive.
Curious that the photo in >>1357642 was taken right around the time that Wardenclyffe was being built. Very curious as to whether Boskovich (Croatian) had any influence on NT (Serb born in Croatia) and in what way (specifically philosophically – “Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis,”).
Answer to this may explain much – not only of NT's future sufferings with the cabal,
but also, more relevant here, the Q crumb alluded to in >>1357200
Any thoughts?