>>13576713

it was all you

you're all alone in your tiny universe

how heroic of you to be so lonly

>>13576734

the

'pre-load' rejection line shows

this is a creep that thinks people are programmable.

what a hero

fake

in themiddle of the night

it's clearly fake

and only the boast bot shill AI is here.

who will come if I keep posting? they must all be out at the bar.

constant use of various phrases that NOONE uses in the real world:

retard

retarded

fag

faggot

tits

pussy

tranny

and phrases of constant put down.

they can't post without it being an antisocial tiraid. It's not just an ethnic , it's a 'filthy' ethnic

it's not just a gay, it's a pedo gay

again NO ONE in the real world thinks or talks like that. UNless they have been trained to do it through constant desenstivization.

so why does it flood these boards?

because it's all fake?

everyone is drowned with in falsity with no real contact with other people?

seems like that.

and the constant mocking, too: who does that ? who speaks in constant platitudes?

who collects pictures of gapjawed people with bug eyes in the throws of megalomanical glee?

it's all fake. it's put here constantly as a way to discourage and mock

>>13576781

if they 'allow' him he should refuse to go back

>>13576795

for example: what real person would post this? it would have to be a drunk asshole on crack

it's FAKE

>>13576805

?

or inane nonsequitors that don't apply.

fake

>>13576820

the censorship through constant haze of revulsion means . . . images must be turned off.

it's so horid with the crap-imagery of amature shillbots, that there is no purpose to having images on.

you'll have to try harder.

>>13576849

"I am not a fuckig bitch, crying faggot or retarded shill."

ya, you are. just for phrasing it like that.

we know that it's a person who works for those who he describes, but pretends to pan because he writes them as being successful:

"For they have twisted our minds to their end."

NO they haven't.

you put that out as a messge because you work for them?

>>13576899

shows you've been a weakminded follow along do what the crowd nudges you to do for a long long time.

>>13576917

if that is true for him, it's true for you.

discussing it like you do just shows you want to cause some kind of emotional distress.

so what does that make you?

you set up a lonely narrative and then proceed to bash everyone in it.

I think that the movie you play in your head is a sad last-run film

>>13576928

awareness only hurts like a hangover.

as you heal you'll grow and become the person you want to be who doesn't spew out hateful invective in a constant sputter of fowl language.

>>13576933

the door of the cinema opens.

the audience steps out into the light of day, bright and fresh. your movie? what was it? it was so bad that they just slept through it anyway.

and no one even remember the title of the film.

>>13576955

I can and did change myself.

>>13576955

and you're the one who puts in a quote, but it's not from the person to whom you post.

what's that all about?

>>13576952

it's frigging the middle of the night.

and if anyone is being even a little bit chatty you pretend like you're the director to try to harsh their mellow.

'So poetic, much babble~

Dance sweetie, dance'

like you're in charge of the festivities.

get a grip.

>>13576969

I asked you directly: why do you put in text that pretends to quote the person but is nothing of them, that they didn't produce, and they have no idea what it means or why it is there?

don't change the subject, tell me why you do that.

>>13576980

I've lurked and I've lingered and I've dealt with the tactics that you use:

1. you did not pharaphrase me. that is a slander

2. you don't have a brain in your work, it's all just mocking and name calling.

you can't come up with anything real to try and goad people into awareness and awakening so you try to kill the joy by making up stuff that is nonsequitor and saying it's about them

that's called spell casting. pretty horrid thing to do to a stranger wihtout cause.

>>13576991

using stock shill phrasiology means you are a war propagandist.

that's your legacy.

you have no idea bout me and yet you slander a billion people.

and all their ancestors.

so I'm the issue?

>>13576980

OK, I see, you are upset that I hit the bullseye.

and you don't want to reform yourself and change your lingo.

so you make me out to be stupid.

that's you projecting your fear that I am correct and that you've been behaving like a loser for decades . . . and that you failed to question the assumptions or grow, but just put on the old shoe of following along with the crowd.

you 'joined' and so you can talk and post like that without consequence except:

not really.

awareness is better done when you are strong and healthy.

start now, and it's still long hard road.

>>13577013

no.

1. Most of the spewtle is soulless AI for-loops.

2. or it's people trying to train others in how to repulse their fellows.

no, desparagager whouses terms of affection as pejorative, I have no such objective, as you say.

what would be nice would be if the constant psyop would cease and this place wasn't just discord bots grooming people to be creeps

but that is your objective and purpose, one who uses a term of affection inappropriately as a way to haze and annoy.

>>13577033

I must have gotten through to you, pejorator of words of affection, because you're enthralled.

you're here to be a creep and normalize it.

I'm here to say 'see, this is someone who tries to normalize being a creep.'

that bugs you of course.

that doesn't mean I want you to have a hard time.

I want you to reform and actually respect others.

stop your constant haze-bot-ness and be a real person who sin't a constant irritent.

then if you do need to say something with great effect, then you can drop it and it won't be 'oh, he says that all the time.'

you actually weaken your effectiveness by doing it too much.

but growth isn't what you do. annoyance and grooming: that's what you are. that's your programmed persona..

>>13577042

I cant' see you're image but I can read what it's named:

I don't claim to have any power in this chat.

you have power in your mind for yourself

I have power in my mind for myself

I would like you to use your power to turn off the discord, in your own mind and turn on the love light.

so that' s it . I conspire to make you aware.

>>13577040

this one goes on with the false assumptin.

and keeps up with the poor-grammar as a psyop supidity.

when you don't use the article 'an' in your phrase, you give away that you are an agency donk doing your psyop for full pay.

and what China has to do with my posts here tonight? Oh, you make up stuff and paste it on people even if it has nothing to do with them.

again: when you make a sentence like 'something is such and such' and you leave out the article 'the', or 'an' , etc, it's not a real sentence. It's a psyop phrase. you useing it marks you as a propagandist.

so what do I care you're on the dole and a taker, not a giver.

well once again they show us what they are.

all a shill spotter can do is distract them, they are unable to learn or grow.

>>13577119

you're all off in a meta, anon. I'm real. I'm sure some of who I interact with are too.

but the ones who start in with the nation and race bait stuff? what do they think that they are doing?

>>13577092

that is odd phrasing but what I mean is that the person isn't thinking, they are just doing a discord insult bit. they 'don't have their brain in it'

I said 'a brain'

I guess in the heat of the moment I said 'well, I can fix it on a rewrite if it ever needed it'

it's called 'first draft'

>>13577143

I don't need anything here.

I'm telling people: the ones who do this are mostly fake.

did I say never do it?

I also say: you do it so much that the technique becomes ineffective. So doesn't that hint that I understand that sometimes that is what the anon do: they post stuff that is rather rough and perhaps shocking.

so , no , I don't 'have to control'.

of course not.

but I have to tell you, that you can learn to control it.

that's a lot different from 'having to control'

I say : eventually you will grow. you'll say 'why did I post that crap?'

if you are real

but I also say: bots are most of it. they do not learn. they can not change.

so I'm doing commentary, not moral judgement.

and it's a lot different.

well you can pretend that my message is meaningless or you can ask yourself: do I really need to spew out this constant vitrol?

(the answer is no)

but sometimes you post 'you pejorative'!

it happens.

you're not going to hell for it.