>>13593186 lb
>this is not a simple recount.
>
>the results may well be different, but they will most likely be damning.
>
>the consequence is not a do-over, but criminal prosecution and the eventual dsiqualification of the election and thus the current government (the line of succession is also invalid).
It's not a simple recount, it's a complex forensic audit.
Katie couldn't even be elected to be a dog-catcher. This is so way out of her league.
>Check um
Extensive and exclusive QResearch analysis of the video footage has concluded that it is in fact, NOT a helicopter. However, Scavino's new top header used to iden this bread's baker is a helicopter. TYB
Let's ask some Newfags to take a look at it and let's see what they say:
>you keep pretending that Dan is somehow responsible for the crap images.
Me? I do? Crap images? Nope.
>seems that he's a quality guy
Never implied that he isn't.
>so unless you have sauce,
>>13590779 Dan Scavino’s new banner pic on Twitter.
>stop talking about Dan. Sounds like you are making things up.
>(me)Let's ask some Newfags to take a look at it and let's see what they say:
And we got to see your newfaggy response.
>Whatever happened to that spaceship rock altering approach velocity
Oumuamua?
http://www.astronomy.com/news/2018/06/speeding-interstellar-object-oumuamua-is-a-comet-not-an-asteroid
Dunno, the site is broken for me.
>Puzzle Coming Together?
Yes, and how [D]o billionaires protect 50% of their capital from perceived impending lawsuit risk?