>>13593963 (PB)
Does anyone think the 'chrome production report from the US special medical corps might need further verification?
Something about this document seems off. Like maybe we've seen the same data a few months ago in different packaging. IDK
And where is the cult's notoriously rigorous opsec? Why put self incriminating data in clear text form at all? Seems like poor data control.
Is this a 'sucker pitch' of evidence for a story that is "too good to check?"