Anonymous ID: da088f May 10, 2018, 11:15 a.m. No.1360333   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0354 >>0411 >>0542

The first biblical mention of Nimrod is in the Table of Nations. He is described as the son of Cush, grandson of Ham, and great-grandson of Noah; and as "a mighty one in the earth" and "a mighty hunter before the Lord".

 

The Seven Laws of Noah (Hebrew: שבע מצוות בני נח‬ Sheva Mitzvot B'nei Noach), also referred to as the Noahide Laws or the Noachide Laws (from the English transliteration of the Hebrew pronunciation of "Noah"), are a set of imperatives which, according to the Talmud, were given by God as a binding set of laws for the "

 

NWO=Nimrod/Noahide World Order

 

What did Christ say about the Noachide Law of the Pharisees?

 

ll them Rabbi.

 

The woes are all woes of hypocrisy and illustrate the differences between inner and outer moral states.[1] Jesus portrays the Pharisees as impatient with outward, ritual observance of minutiae which made them look acceptable and virtuous outwardly but left the inner person unreformed. See also Letter and spirit of the law.

 

The seven woes

The seven woes of hypocrisy are:

 

They taught about God but did not love God – they did not enter the kingdom of heaven themselves, nor did they let others enter.(Matt 23:14)

They preached God but converted people to dead religion, thus making those converts twice as much sons of hell as they themselves were. (Matt 23:15)

They taught that an oath sworn by the temple or altar was not binding, but that if sworn by the gold ornamentation of the temple, or by a sacrificial gift on the altar, it was binding. The gold and gifts, however, were not sacred in themselves as the temple and altar were, but derived a measure of lesser sacredness by being connected to the temple or altar. The teachers and Pharisees worshiped at the temple and offered sacrifices at the altar because they knew that the temple and altar were sacred. How then could they deny oath-binding value to what was truly sacred and accord it to objects of trivial and derived sacredness? (Matt 23:16–22)

They taught the law but did not practice some of the most important parts of the law – justice, mercy, faithfulness to God. They obeyed the minutiae of the law such as tithing spices but not the weightier matters of the law. (Matt 23:23–24)

They presented an appearance of being 'clean' (self-restrained, not involved in carnal matters), yet they were dirty inside: they seethed with hidden worldly desires, carnality. They were full of greed and self-indulgence. (Matt 23:25–26)

They exhibited themselves as righteous on account of being scrupulous keepers of the law, but were in fact not righteous: their mask of righteousness hid a secret inner world of ungodly thoughts and feelings. They were full of wickedness. They were like whitewashed tombs, beautiful on the outside, but full of dead men's bones. (Matt 23:27–28)

They professed a high regard for the dead prophets of old, and claimed that they would never have persecuted and murdered prophets, when in fact they were cut from the same cloth as the persecutors and murderers: they too had murderous blood in their veins (This "woe" foreshadows the Pharisees' eventual condemnation of Jesus himself, as well.) (Matt 23:29–36)

Anonymous ID: da088f May 10, 2018, 12:32 p.m. No.1360964   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I find it Hilarious that no matter how hard the Jews try to spin this shit the arrow travels 360 and ends up pointing at another pervert Jew

 

Every.Single.Time

Anonymous ID: da088f May 10, 2018, 12:34 p.m. No.1360998   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1360954

Not all Christians are pro Israel Zionists

Christianity has historically persecuted Jews….just ask any Jew they will cry about it for eternity