F AGG OT
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth..
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth…
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth..
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth….
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth…..
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth..
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth……
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth…
>>13603401>>13603506
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The jews are a prop. Satan commands the power here on earth and his minions are right here on this board
>The haters are being exposed
>All I see are a bunch of Haters and malcontents that are too full of anger to see the truth. Sad
>Always remember - the jew hate is a diversion from the truth.
GOOD THING JONJEWDLE IS HERE TO TELL ALL THE ANONS WHAT IS AND IS NOT TRUTH, WHAT DOES AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE JUDAISM, AND WHAT THE Q MOVEMENT IS AND IS NOT ABOUT. HE WILL DO ALL YOUR THINK FOR YOU GOYIM, WHOOPS I MEAN MONKEYS, SHIT I MEAN ANONS
>Nothing to explain to people that will not see or hear truth.
ONLY JONJEWDLE GETS TO DECIDE WHAT THE TRUTH IS AND THE TRUTH IS THAT JEWS DO NOT EVEN EXIST. THEY ARE MYTHICAL UNICORN CREATURES FROM THE LAND OF FANTASY. NOW STFU GOYIM AND PAY YOUR TITHES.
>Sometimes you can't tell people. You have to show them.
JON JEWDLE IS GOING TO SHOW YOU HOW STUPID YOU ARE FOR BLAMING JEWS FOR THE THE THINGS THAT JEWS DO. IT IS ACTUALLY ALL YOUR FAULT. HE WILL SHOW YOU.
>Dark to Light
GUYS JON KIKEL SAID DARK TO LIGHT SO HE IS TOTALLY NOT A SUBVERSIVE KIKE HERE TO STIFLE FREE SPEECH. ANYONE THAT QUOTES FROM Q DROPS HAS TO BE 100% ON THE LEVEL. USE YOUR FUCKIN BRIANS MORANS
Is there even 1% doubt?
>This board isn't at all in the spirit of the Q Posts or the spirit of Anon dig meme pray. It's devolved into racist anger and hatred of the most vile form.
IT IS COMPLETELY RACIST TO BLAME THE JEWS FOR SHIT THAT THE JEWS DO. IF Q OR POTUS SAY YOU EVEN EVEN MENTION THE WORD JEW YOU WOULD BE EXECUTED AND THEN KILLED. SIT BACK, SHUT UP, AND LET JONJEWDLE TELL YOU ABOUT THE SPIRIT OF Q RESEARCH.
>This War will be won by love and light, not racist rants and angry diatribes.
>
>Dark to Light
>
>God Wins
>
>Love wins
JON JEWDLE WENT BACK TO THE HIGH ROAD AND GOD WINS/LOVE WINS DARK TO LIGHT BECAUSE EVERYONE KNOWS WHEN YOU'VE BEEN COMPLETELY CORNERED AND BTFO THE BEST THING TO DO IS JUST QUOTE SOME Q DROPS AND PLAY THE VICTIM CARD. ALSO MAKE SURE TO SAY THE PERSON YOU ARE ARGUING WITH IS ANGRY, THAT SHIT ALWAYS WORKS.
Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.
2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.
3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.
4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.
5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.
6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin – an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.
Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later – an emotional yo-yo.
With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game – where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.
7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.
I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.
8) Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:
a) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.
b) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get permission' or instruction from a formal chain of command.
c) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.
HERE'S A FUN EXERCISE, START AN ARGUMENT WITH JONJEWDLE OR ONE OF THE OTHER JEW LACKEYS >>13603606, >>13603593 AND SEE HOW MANY OF THESE RULES THEY CAN HIT IN ONE SESSION. IT'S GREAT PRACTICE.
MY MISTAKE, YOU ARE TOTALLY NOT A KIKE.
1PBTID