>can reveal
interesting chose of words. who is telling them what they can and can not reveal?
>Not inserted.
>Intentionally misunderstood,
Is it ever under any circumstance ok to acknowledge that maybe the bible has been tampered with in the last 2000 years? The jot and tittle is a circular argument that can not be disproved much like pic related. It stops people form critical thinking, not exactly what I would attribute to how Jesus is portrayed. Much more like the Pharisaical way of thinking. Worship the KJV or worship our creator might be another way of looking at it.
There might be another reason besides satanic gibberish that the model of Christianity practiced in the west and mostly based on the catholic churches agreed upon framework is crumbling.