>>13608209

I’m the anon that asked much earlier today, thank you for laying it out like you did. I really doubted that it would take that much for the almost 5000 posts… but i see now how much it really would average especially considering making the images large enough to see in a printed page. It really is a tremendous amount of material. Don’t know if i can afford it even at the smart budget method you suggest, but i will consider making such a ‘hard copy’.

Another anon pointed something that really explodes the size of this… trying to include in some kind of hard copy as well… all the in context and contemporaneous comments that anons included each time a q post appeared. Holy Nuts… that’s a lot of information.

Really… no one elseanon has tried this? Even without the contextual material… i still think the hard coy ‘BOOK’ would be an impressive tactical thing to put in someone’s hand challenging to so easily dismiss what has happened here kun and on chan before.

>>13608310

Agreed. The anon comments directly to a q post, are not where the rubber really met the road. The real action was always hours and days after each post, often with additional q post again.

Something else that might be interesting and maybe more useful, separating into only two categories… the Q post that were very cryptic and coded or predictive which never happened and so forth… from the more plain text, philosophically oriented, spirit boosting and uplifting posts from Q. Might be a shorter BOOK, but much more useful and contrasting from the ‘misinformation is necessary’ type of posts.

Just spitballing, anons

>>13608402

>>13608344

Thanks for banging this back and forth.

This anon is thinking divided into two ‘books’. One with the clear text, inspirational posts.

The other with all the rest, including any of the contested posts speculated and imposters and the super cryptics. Just so that nothing is left out, but at hand in case one future super-autist can divine it.

>>13608455

Agreed. The sociological aspect to all this is enough to justify the upfront. No matter what if ever the public, let alone anons, ever figure all the back story… the surface story is worthy of doctoral study.

>>13608554

Ding ding ding

>>13608622

Makes sense, from [their] point of view.

>>13608719

Not exactly sure how you meant that. Thisanon has a history appreciating history, particularly disputed history and how things actually transpired. This Q ‘thing’ is, big. Should We, humanity on Earth, survive this current passage Q MUST be studied, written about and upheld for what could be ‘just that little enough extra’ that gave just enough people, just enough hope to push through hell to get to the other side alive.

This is an incredible story of survival, already. Anons can be thanked in no small part. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think this over by a long shot and it’s not in the bag yet… but there is reason for optimism