>>13608012 Lb

I'm not talking about dogma anon, it's about Truth.

It has nothing to do with her inability to choose a husband, or Jesus inability to help her, or modern abortion. That story is about Living Water.

Also if you're going to talk about a particular passage, make sure you know it. Most of what you said (not talking about your interpretation here) is false. There were no kids, it was Jacobs well (again, important) not a pond, she didn't ask Jesus for help getting the water but rather He asked her for a drink, etc.

How will you understand the parable if you don't even know the passage and add/take away from it?

>>13608132

No. That's a false teaching.

The bible NEVER tells you you must believe before death. It DOES tell you every eye will see Him, and every tongue will profess He is Lord.

>>13608141

>>13608132

Sorry I meant to tag the post you were replying to. >>13608124

>>13608212

The original is in Greek, not Aramaic.

>>13608256

No it wasn't.

Some argue it was because the author used "Aramaic thinking".

One day you'll learn the TRUTH and understand what "you must be born again" really means, what Jesus meant by "If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you?" and why "scholars" argue over who wrote what when.