kek, now I'm tracking your IP hash? Fucking retard.
You're a kike shill.
It's because as we have discussed I remember everything and you glow from space.
AZ AUDIT
>I love you too OSS. Please do something positive instead of harassing the villagers.
>If it must be it must be. I gladly take the slings of arrows for America.
-
Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
>Anons are LOVE and LIGHT
>
>Anons don't hate
>
>Anons are not based on RACE, SKIN COLOR or RELIGION
>
>Anons are leading humanity to the LIGHT
>Look - I use a quote from President Trump. Now he's a Jew to be hated on?
>
>DARK TO LIGHT
>
>Racist haters have infiltrated Q Research and now control what you see in the notables
>THEY HATE THE LIGHT
>
>Racist Haters HATE TO BE EXPOSED
>
>They will ALL be pushed into the light.
>The Cabal are Satanist Murderers who use jews as a prop and a bunch of racist haters that control the kitchen bought into it
>Racist haters who try to cover up the fact that the Cabal is a cult of Satanic Murderers that committed crimes against humanity
>
>Look here at the jews. Everybody but us is a jew infiltrator.
>
>What is OSS hiding? Who does he work for?
>What are you hiding with your Jew Hatred OSS? Why do you call everybody, including Q, a Jew and a Kike? Who do you work for? Why do you namefag and attempt to doxx anons? Why do you fight to control the kitchen and the notables? Why do you run every baker off?
>
>Difficult questions… No answers.
>Nice deflection. You're being called a racist because you protect the Satanic Cult that runs the World by using the Jewish People as a prop. You call everybody who disagrees with you a kike.
>
>If you don't want to be called a racist hate baiter stop acting and behaving like a racist hate baiter.
>
>ANONS ARE LOVE AND LIGHT
>
>Anons are the 2nd most attacked next to President Trump (Q+)
>
>OSS admitted to calling Q a kike
I never called Q a kike, it was a joke and now the real retarded kike is trying to use it as some sort of defense to kikedom.
>OSS if you want to corrupt the board with racist angry posts attacking Jews, Anons and America, Anons will make a defense of Q Research and America.
>
>It's just that simple. Anons don't hate on each other. Anons don't see race, religion or skin color.
>
>ANONS ARE LIGHT AND LOVE
>OSS jokes that he called Q a kike. That's not a very good joke.
>Yep. OSS spurged right before the 2020 Election, days before the vote and destroyed the board cohesion. Now, right during a key phase of the Arizona Audit? He's at it again.
>
>Patterns… M OSS AD
>I was going to comment the same till I got sidetracked.
>
>Nice banner baker. I love this baker anons. Great notables and constant fresh bread.
>
>MARATHON BAKER
>Love overcomes hate
>
>God WINS
>
>Love WINS
>
>Follow Christ and repent
>Follow Christ and repent
>Follow Christ and repent
>Follow Christ and repent
>Follow Christ and repent
>Follow Christ and repent
This picture demonstrated in text.
>You see it anons? Our love for each other causes them distress.
>
>Love WINS
>
>Love OVERCOMES hate
>We're going to introduce haters like you to a new world of LOVE and LIGHT
That's not true. JonDoodle never goes away no matter how many times anons expose for the notable deleting free speech censor jew he is. He just changes persona and starts over with his same crew. Once every anon knows what a kike Doodle is he'll vanish and return with a new name
Just read these and then watch how doodle argues. It becomes obvious as fuck.
Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.
2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.
3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.
4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.
5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.
6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin – an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial.
Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later – an emotional yo-yo.
With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game – where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.
7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.
I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.
8) Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:
a) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.
b) When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get permission' or instruction from a formal chain of command.
c) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.
>I'm anon but you've been following my IP hash for months now OSS attempting to doxx me.
>
>Why do you try to run all the bakers off? Why do you call everybody that disagrees with the racist hatred you spew a kike and a jew? Why do you denigrate and demean then try to doxx other anons that wont cow to you?
>
>Difficult questions OSS…
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations – as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.