Try this jingoist doggerel
>13611460
"What better way for man to die than facing fearful odds
for the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his gods?"
If the heroic couplet doesn't help then repeat this mantra: MI is running all I see from the westernmost pixel, to the deepest voxel, and I myself am are soaking in the Shekinah. "
Should be a PH with double bar (or other enhancement) to reflect the special circumstance of the service member's being summarily murdered by a fake president. IMO.
Did not the great POTUS Lincoln throw most of Maryland's seditious legislators into hoosegow?
https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/speccol/sc5500/sc5572/000001/000000/000017/html/t17.html
And then there's a dispute with chief justice of SCOTUS Roger ye 'division shill' Taney ?
On May 28, 1861, Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney directly challenged President Abraham Lincoln’s wartime suspension of the great writ of habeas corpus, in a national constitutional showdown.
>As Chief Justice, Taney was forced to issue the presidential oath to Lincoln in March 1861, and to listen to Lincoln’s inaugural address, where he again criticized Taney and the Dred Scott decision, but not directly by name.
>About three months later, Taney had his chance to address Lincoln’s vision of executive power in Ex Parte Merryman.
Article 1, Section 9, of the Constitution states that “the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” The Great Writ’s origins go back to the signing of the Magna Carta in England in 1215 and the writ compels the government to show cause to a judge for the arrest or detention of a person.
Taney is not only seditious he is reeeeeeeeeee lly stretching the jurisprudential rubber
the plod thickens:
“The clause in the Constitution which authorizes the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is in the ninth section of the first article. This article is devoted to the Legislative Department of the United States, and has not the slightest reference to the Executive Department,” Taney argued. “I can see no ground whatever for supposing that the President in any emergency or in any state of things can authorize the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, or arrest a citizen except in aid of the judicial power,” Taney concluded.
>Lincoln didn’t respond directly or immediately to the Ex Parte Merryman decision. Instead, he waited until a July 4th address to confront Taney at a special session of Congress.
Lincoln then presented his famous response to Taney. “Are all the laws but one to go unexecuted, and the Government itself go to pieces lest that one be violated? Even in such a case, would not the official oath be broken if the Government should be overthrown when it was believed that disregarding the single law would tend to preserve it?”
https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/lincoln-and-taneys-great-writ-showdown