There has been a drastic reduction of effortposting here.

There's too much (You)ing "anons" that don't actually contribute. There's too much lauding over "owning the shills" (which is just samefags arguing with themselves the majority of the time, it would seem). There's too much muh baker going on.

I worry too many of you have lost your focus. You can go on /pol/ still and find plenty of genuine conversation that doesn't devolve to erosion of the original argument/conversation and consequent redirection.

Start getting better at recognizing people that aren't here for the right reason and quit wasting so much of our bread on "shitposting" and (You)ing people that aren't here to help, yes, even if you're "totally le owning le shills, anon!"

>>13614666

This dogecoin mess is distracting Norman from altseason and what that means for various prominent sectors of business, commerce and various types of infrastructure.

In short, governments are losing control and the era of centralized rule is quickly coming to a close. The trick, at the moment, is avoiding skynet and instead properly manifesting a reality where technology adequately serves us instead of subjugating us.

That's probably one of the biggest things. In fact, it even coincides with this election mess, since Blockchain answers the election integrity question.

The reality is that's not Joe Biden and the jig is just about up.

>>13614674

I understand that Q has made a few evangelical appeals, but this is an irreligious place, dedicated to research that furthers our movement, or at least discussion that better informs passersby such that they have a keener ability to help manifest the reality that rescues the wavering masses from control most don't notice.

You may go to "Church" to get your fix. You can read the bible. You can pray with your community. This should be encouraged for many, in fact.

However, this isn't the place to take up bread space for your digital prayers and what you're doing is actually diluting necessary work much more than it is helping.

The next (okay, probably current) attack vector is TOR posters. Soon, they will be disconnected by a flood of bots using 000000.

>>13614727

That's what I'm talking about.

DOGE is a distraction.

I'm still weighing whether or not EM defected and is doing this for the sake of raising awareness of Blockchain, or if I/we was (were) wrong about him helping.

DOGE investments will get you justed. Even if I'm wrong, it pails in comparison to other options, but I'm not here to tell you what to do with money.

The idea is DOGE is a meme and a waste of money. The tokenomics don't look good for newfags and putting money in to it isn't necessarily a bad idea because it won't make you money (it will), but because it takes advantage of hype instead of understanding.

To be blunt, if you understood Blockchain, your aim wouldn't be vaporware like DOGE, it would be tech which offers tangible innovations.

>>13614751

I'm saying this to (You) because I understand you have modest intentions, anon.

Do not misunderstand, I stand beside you.

Just tone it down. We all need to be more responsible with what we post and I don't mean to disclude myself.

>>13614771

Thank you for asking this question, but I'm afraid you misunderstand, fren.

The reality is there isn't just a bunch of average "anons" here. There's many bots, many of what you call "shills" (a term vastly diluted) and considerable amount of bad actors.

One would easily observe the people with modest intentions like the anon I threw a (You) at, so it makes sense to me to try to get through to them, instead of shouting at deaf ears, like the fapbait posters (people trying to get anons to masturbate instead of thinking clearly and focusing) or leftypol/SRS faggots that just come here to LARP as anons to subtly piss us off.

In short, my aim is to get anons that I think might listen to start contributing and stop doing this (well, everyone else is doing it) thing.

>>13614779

>it's a slide constructed by the same shills that start 'baker wars'

I'd be thrilled if more anons actually recognized this.

I remember plenty of us telling anons a year and a half ago that this shit was about to start.

The bothersome part of it is that there was some great conversation going on over at /comms/ before it went full retard.

Maybe I'm an idealist and just holding on to "better times", but I think if more of us practice the temperance demanded by improvement, we could see some relief of all of this bullshit.

>>13614787

Anon, this is the source of my doubt.

I'm not claiming you're wrong or anything. I just simply remember red roses being discussed quite a bit just before EM made this tweet.

Some anons here agreed this might be evidence of him defecting.

I also remember the Alice in Wonderland scene of "painting the roses red" being posted here a few times right around then as well.

I'm just seeing patterns, that's all.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1262076474565242880

>>13614732

>>13614810

>the best way to deflate the ego of this little attention whore in the kitchen is to ignore it

That's all that needs to be done. Lauding the importance of baking by "thanking the baker" has been a transparent tactic for quite a while now. They've never served any purpose; they're always in the first hundred posts only, they mostly just post fapbait and I've noticed an obvious trend that the people that do this contribute nothing else the entire thread.

Over the years, it's changed from "thank you baker", "Thank you, Baker!", or something innocent and plain to "TYB", "tanks bakes" and different languages, all showing a syntax shift trend, which to me indicates that this trend reveals filter bypass.

If this is the case, certain people have been doing this on purpose, likely to crack consensus about the bakers' imagined necessary role here. I'm willing to guess it was to frame them as being needed or retaining authority, which laid the foundation for what's currently unfolding: D&C and distraction.

>>13614876

I'm arguing against none of that. I'm simply suggesting that doesn't help us and it only dilutes things.

I'm not even touching upon your freshmonic comprehension of spirituality here. I'm being quite nice.

At the very least, do moralposting. All that shit does is further confuses Norman and teaches people that we have spiritual investments, which just paints more targets for [them], which often sprouts ideas for D&C.

Many of us have said for a while that Q's evangelical appeals were detrimental more than they were beneficial and this is clearly the evidence for that.

>>13614908

Musk's subsidies were dwarfed by that of GM and the other big automotive players.

Not only did he get a fraction of what they got, he paid them back already.

Can you blame EM for innovating in a way that others haven't and combining that with sufficient marketing? I think he, in this case, is the victim (I'm saying this in jest) of our government's "Green trend", whereby he was rewarded with "green" subsidies for making "environmentally friendly" pushes for the automotive industry.

He is not drinking from government funds, or, at least, a lot less than others in his class.

Besides, you're not pointing to the real areas of concern with EM, the wife. She's what should really perk your ears up. Even then, the weird occult-like people aren't always all bad.

Forgive me for treating your concerns like they're the product of ignorance (even if they are), but there's a lot more to learn, I'm afraid.

>>13614944

Be sure to do ID+, so you can also filter out the retards pretending to not be from the same faggot group.

>>13614953

You do not need a boss.

I don't want Atlas to shrug or anything and I understand the need for general workers, but if you're capable enough to wade through everything in a place like this, you're competent enough to embrace an entrepreneurial mindset and escape the wage cage.

This is the perfect opportunity and getting out of the wage cage is freeing in many more ways than one.

>>13614957

This imagined world you live in, where everyone who says something you disagree with is a "shill" is absolutely wasteful.

>Normans shouldn't even be here

Well, they are. Their opinions aren't the issue though, it's them wasting bread in an area where we're way past the whole evangelical thing. You want to know how we combat this senseless behavior? You calmly correct it or provoke them to their breaking point. Sure, there might be more ways, but I encourage you to give it a go and see what works best for you.

>>13614963

Some humans have/had black eyes (not the injury kind).

>>13614974

My aim isn't to dupe you here, anon. I'm simply explaining that you don't know what's going on like you seem to think you do. I'm letting you down easily here…

Being upset with me is pointless.

>>13614987

The "evil" tribe that's been hunting and farming us for probably more than 10,000 years.

>>13614995

>And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full.

Matthew 6:5

For a book of such importance to you, it's awfully confusing how you don't seem to want to read it.

>>13615016

read >>13615041

It might do you some good.

>>13615057

>>13615062

Anyone that stops you at "it's the masons" or "it's the jews" or "it's the jesuits" is duping you or is impotent.

Most low-level masons are lonely closeted boomers.

Most "Jews" are big nosed freaks who worry too much about money and how to get welfare, who don't care about Loxism or Zion.

Most Catholics are preoccupied with waiting around for death so they can hang out with Anu/Yahweh and get wrecked on another go round (the dumbest of them all).

Boiling any of this down to "it's that group's fault" isn't worth your time.

If you want an aim, look at the families and the left hand faggots preventing us from ascending by perpetuating this cycle of low vibration.

>>13615093

People died because they didn't follow directions.

These people weren't behind the wheel and Tesla insists that if you use "Full Self-Driving" that you don't sit in the backseat and take a nap or fuck your girlfriend.

Actually read things and stop being retarded.

>>13615101

>Many of us are "Christians".

For now.

>>13615098

>other people are newbies

<it's the satanists

"Satan" simply means antagonist, adversary or contender.

You need to find an actual being/person to pin "Satan" on.

Give Saturn a try. See where that gets you.

>>13615138

>going down the Saturn route is a distraction from the main event

You're in the wrong place.

>>13615141

Maybe actually do some research on your own instead of depending on anyone and everyone to do it for you.

Bear in mind, you're only here because we let you find us.

>>13614657

Do you actually want a lead? It's not that complicated.

What goes on UNDER China?

>>13615157

>Explain why the Saturn connection matters a damn…

top kek

Did you fall in to a see of irony or something?

>>13615180

You're just new.