Anonymous ID: 5ee8a4 May 8, 2021, 11 p.m. No.13618418   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8433

>>13618391

Draining simply exposes, the player's are now almost all to a list of single digits doxed…

 

The cannot walk and show their faces in public.

It has expanded not to the Sate levels… Az, Ca., Ny., Ga…. this list of exposures are increasing on a daily basis, to also enjoy & include the swampy connections to the corporations and the MSM.

 

But the Swamp is defiantly even today continuing to drain…

 

No, the Swap still Drains and we anons are the assist.

 

Which is why the shrills here denounce and try to convince of a different truth in the history they are desperate to write.

Anonymous ID: 5ee8a4 May 8, 2021, 11:14 p.m. No.13618479   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8485 >>8493 >>8516

>>13618366

>>13618366

…Statistics…

kek

During WWII, the Navy tried to determine where they needed to armor their aircraft to ensure they came back home. They ran an analysis of where planes had been shot up, and came up with this.

 

Obviously the places that needed to be up-armored are the wingtips, the central body, and the elevators. That’s where the planes were all getting shot up.

 

Abraham Wald, a statistician, disagreed. He thought they should better armor the nose area, engines, and mid-body. Which was crazy, of course. That’s not where the planes were getting shot.

 

Except Mr. Wald realized what the others didn’t. The planes were getting shot there too, but they weren’t making it home. What the Navy thought it had done was analyze where aircraft were suffering the most damage. What they had actually done was analyze where aircraft could suffer the most damage without catastrophic failure. All of the places that weren’t hit? Those planes had been shot there and crashed. They weren’t looking at the whole sample set, only the survivors.

Anonymous ID: 5ee8a4 May 8, 2021, 11:45 p.m. No.13618604   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8618

>>13618541

Just because it's crazy doesn't mean to see it from other angles.

 

>>13618569

>>13618569

 

Mighty Thoughtful of Gary.. >>>13618552

>no (You) For You..

>i've BEEN that one guy, in industry and in academia, more times than i care to remember, because it is generally NOT a fun experience.

 

>it eats at enthusiasm and motivation, and wears on the soul to have to argue with idiots who stubbornly refuse to let you help them, all the while hurling insults.

 

It's what happens when even a child debunks and shames adults with simple ideas and wisdoms.

They must trod down on those not as they.