>>13621098 pb
>why did five states suddenly announce they would pause counting for the night?
states run elections INDEPENDENTLY. five states SIMULTANEOUSLY announcing they were pausing the counting is, all by itself, PROOF of collusion and conspiracy.
>the smart meters burnt the houses. It was PG&E.
>Smart meters made in China
care to offer an explanation of exactly how the meters could do that? or are you just posting harebrained conspiracy BS?
well that description of "brown shirts" exactly fits BLM/antifa and their demoncrat enablers.
are the dems now admitting that THEY are the fascists?
>because you are being radiated 24/7 by an electromagnetic weapon, it has likely been going on for decades, if not longer
says the person sitting with their face 12 inches from a large screen monitor, next to a computer connected to peripherals and the internet by wifi.
SMFH!
>the EM weapon covers the globe, apart from maybe the Antarctic
where we live is just over one hour drive to a major metropolis. there is no cell service within 15 miles of our home.
50 miles if you go the opposite direction. we have no wifi in the house, everything hardwired with ethernet cable, no cordless phones, etc.
the house itself has a metal roof and metal siding, all grounded. ya don't need to go to antarctica, anon. just use your brain.
IN THE DANGEROUS KITCHEN
the cat things… with the sharp little edges that can cut your fingers when you're not looking…
the soft little things on the floor that you step on…
>you have access to radio, still, right?
>about 8k satellites in orbit
AM/FM radio and TV broadcast are all in the MHz region of the spectrum. harmless.
satellites do broadcast in the microwave region, however they are 25,000 miles away, and their individual radiated power is approximately equal to a candleflame.
ever heard of the inverse square law?
"there is NOTHING more dangerous than a LITTLE bit of knowledge." i'd be careful, if i were you.
sorry, DUDE, but not just wrong… total gibberish. spend a lifetime publishing scientific research, then get back to me.
>The DEW explanation may sound crazy, but it's more plausible than hijacked smart meters
if by plausible, you mean within the realm of scientific technological possibility, then i agree 100%.
>wtf, you have trust in 'published scientific research'?
i WRITE it, DUMBASS, not just read it. i know what's bs and what isn't.